Dependabot vs Snyk

Overview

Snyk

Stacks479

Followers379

Votes20

Dependabot

Stacks102

Followers113

Votes1

Dependabot vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Dependabot and Snyk are both tools that help improve software security by identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in dependencies. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Integration with Development Workflows: Dependabot integrates seamlessly with popular development platforms, such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing it to automatically detect and update outdated dependencies. On the other hand, Snyk also integrates with these platforms but offers additional integrations with CI/CD pipelines, package managers, and IDEs, providing more flexibility in different development workflows.
Scope of Security Testing: Dependabot primarily focuses on identifying and updating outdated dependencies to address security vulnerabilities. It notifies developers about available updates and helps automate the update process. In contrast, Snyk offers a wider scope of testing, not only identifying outdated dependencies but also actively scanning for vulnerabilities within the dependencies themselves, providing more comprehensive security assessment.
Breadth of Language Support: Dependabot has extensive language support and can analyze dependencies for a wide range of programming languages and ecosystems, including Ruby, JavaScript, Python, Java, and many more. Snyk also supports numerous languages but has a slightly wider range, covering additional languages, such as Go, Swift, Rust, and PHP.
Vulnerability Intelligence: Snyk provides detailed vulnerability information, including severity ratings, exploit maturity, and remediation steps. It offers insights into the specific risks associated with each vulnerability and provides recommendations on how to address them efficiently. Dependabot, although effective in identifying outdated dependencies, does not offer the same level of vulnerability intelligence as Snyk.
Community and Ecosystem: Snyk has a strong community and ecosystem, with a wide range of integrations, plugins, and extensions available. It also offers a vast database of known vulnerabilities and remediation guidance provided by the community. Dependabot, while widely used, may not have the same level of community support and ecosystem integration as Snyk.
Pricing Model: Dependabot is generally available for free, and its core features are included in most popular development platforms. However, some advanced features may require a subscription or additional payment. Snyk offers both free and paid plans, with the free plan covering basic vulnerability testing and higher-tier plans providing advanced features, such as license compliance monitoring and organization-wide security policy enforcement.

In summary, Dependabot automates dependency updates by monitoring repositories for outdated dependencies and creating pull requests to update them, streamlining the process of keeping projects up-to-date. On the other hand, Snyk offers comprehensive security scanning capabilities, detecting vulnerabilities in dependencies and providing actionable insights to remediate security risks, making it a valuable tool for ensuring the security posture of software projects.

Advice on Snyk, Dependabot

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk	Dependabot
Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform	Dependabot helps you keep your dependencies up to date. Every day, it checks your dependency files for outdated requirements and opens individual PRs for any it finds. You review, merge, and get to work on the latest, most secure releases.
-	Simple, drip-feed getting started flow; Security advisories handled automatically; Great pull requests that stay up-to-date; Compatibility scores for each update; Powerful configuration options; Live, daily, weekly or monthly updates
Statistics
Stacks 479	Stacks 102
Followers 379	Followers 113
Votes 20	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection	Pros 1 Free for github projects
Integrations
Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java	Ruby PHP GitHub Python JavaScript Yarn Gradle Rust Apache Maven Elixir

What are some alternatives to Snyk, Dependabot?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Dependabot vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Dependabot and Snyk are both tools that help improve software security by identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in dependencies. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Integration with Development Workflows: Dependabot integrates seamlessly with popular development platforms, such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing it to automatically detect and update outdated dependencies. On the other hand, Snyk also integrates with these platforms but offers additional integrations with CI/CD pipelines, package managers, and IDEs, providing more flexibility in different development workflows.
Scope of Security Testing: Dependabot primarily focuses on identifying and updating outdated dependencies to address security vulnerabilities. It notifies developers about available updates and helps automate the update process. In contrast, Snyk offers a wider scope of testing, not only identifying outdated dependencies but also actively scanning for vulnerabilities within the dependencies themselves, providing more comprehensive security assessment.
Breadth of Language Support: Dependabot has extensive language support and can analyze dependencies for a wide range of programming languages and ecosystems, including Ruby, JavaScript, Python, Java, and many more. Snyk also supports numerous languages but has a slightly wider range, covering additional languages, such as Go, Swift, Rust, and PHP.
Vulnerability Intelligence: Snyk provides detailed vulnerability information, including severity ratings, exploit maturity, and remediation steps. It offers insights into the specific risks associated with each vulnerability and provides recommendations on how to address them efficiently. Dependabot, although effective in identifying outdated dependencies, does not offer the same level of vulnerability intelligence as Snyk.
Community and Ecosystem: Snyk has a strong community and ecosystem, with a wide range of integrations, plugins, and extensions available. It also offers a vast database of known vulnerabilities and remediation guidance provided by the community. Dependabot, while widely used, may not have the same level of community support and ecosystem integration as Snyk.
Pricing Model: Dependabot is generally available for free, and its core features are included in most popular development platforms. However, some advanced features may require a subscription or additional payment. Snyk offers both free and paid plans, with the free plan covering basic vulnerability testing and higher-tier plans providing advanced features, such as license compliance monitoring and organization-wide security policy enforcement.

Dependabot vs Snyk

Overview

Dependabot vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Advice on Snyk, Dependabot

Detailed Comparison