FOSSA vs Snyk

Overview

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

FOSSA

Stacks28

Followers37

Votes4

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks185

FOSSA vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction

FOSSA and Snyk are both software development tools that focus on managing and ensuring the security of open source components used in projects. However, there are key differences between the two:

Integration with CI/CD pipelines: FOSSA provides extensive support for integration with a wide range of CI/CD pipelines, including popular options like Jenkins, GitLab, and Travis CI. This allows developers to seamlessly incorporate FOSSA's capabilities into their existing development workflows. On the other hand, Snyk offers similar integration options but with a more limited selection of CI/CD pipelines.
License compliance management: While both FOSSA and Snyk offer features for identifying open source dependencies and their associated licenses, FOSSA goes a step further by providing comprehensive license compliance management. FOSSA's platform allows users to track the licenses used in their projects, assess license compatibility, and enforce compliance policies. Snyk, on the other hand, primarily focuses on vulnerability detection and mitigation.
Enterprise-grade security: FOSSA positions itself as an enterprise-grade solution, with advanced security features tailored for large organizations. FOSSA offers features such as fine-grained access control, audit logs, and security reports that provide deep insights into the security posture of projects at scale. While Snyk also targets enterprise users, FOSSA's security capabilities are specifically designed to address the needs of larger organizations.
Dependency management: Both FOSSA and Snyk provide dependency management capabilities, allowing developers to track and manage their project's open source dependencies. However, Snyk places a stronger emphasis on this aspect and offers additional features such as automated dependency updates and support for different package managers. FOSSA, on the other hand, focuses more on comprehensive security and compliance management.
Customizable policies: FOSSA provides users with the ability to customize policies and create specific rules for vulnerability and license compliance. This allows organizations to enforce their own security and compliance standards. Snyk, while offering some degree of customization, has more limited options when it comes to policy configuration and enforcement.
Developer-centric approach: Snyk takes a more developer-centric approach with its user interface and experience. The tool emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it more accessible to developers of all skill levels. FOSSA, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich platform, which may be better suited for organizations with more complex requirements.

In summary, FOSSA and Snyk differ in their integration capabilities with CI/CD pipelines, the extent of license compliance management features, focus on enterprise-grade security, approach to dependency management, level of customizable policies, and user experience. Ultimately, the choice between FOSSA and Snyk depends on the specific needs and priorities of the organization or development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Snyk, FOSSA

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk	FOSSA
Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform	Stop vulnerabilities, automate compliance, and mitigate third-party risk in your applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 185
Stacks 580	Stacks 28
Followers 380	Followers 37
Votes 20	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection	Pros 1 Easy to integrate 1 Fewer false positives 1 Native to CI 1 Supports full text license scanning
Integrations
Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java	Yarn .NET Core Android OS Travis CI Bitbucket Buck Clojure Haskell SBT Python

What are some alternatives to Snyk, FOSSA?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

FOSSA vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction

FOSSA and Snyk are both software development tools that focus on managing and ensuring the security of open source components used in projects. However, there are key differences between the two:

Integration with CI/CD pipelines: FOSSA provides extensive support for integration with a wide range of CI/CD pipelines, including popular options like Jenkins, GitLab, and Travis CI. This allows developers to seamlessly incorporate FOSSA's capabilities into their existing development workflows. On the other hand, Snyk offers similar integration options but with a more limited selection of CI/CD pipelines.
License compliance management: While both FOSSA and Snyk offer features for identifying open source dependencies and their associated licenses, FOSSA goes a step further by providing comprehensive license compliance management. FOSSA's platform allows users to track the licenses used in their projects, assess license compatibility, and enforce compliance policies. Snyk, on the other hand, primarily focuses on vulnerability detection and mitigation.
Enterprise-grade security: FOSSA positions itself as an enterprise-grade solution, with advanced security features tailored for large organizations. FOSSA offers features such as fine-grained access control, audit logs, and security reports that provide deep insights into the security posture of projects at scale. While Snyk also targets enterprise users, FOSSA's security capabilities are specifically designed to address the needs of larger organizations.
Dependency management: Both FOSSA and Snyk provide dependency management capabilities, allowing developers to track and manage their project's open source dependencies. However, Snyk places a stronger emphasis on this aspect and offers additional features such as automated dependency updates and support for different package managers. FOSSA, on the other hand, focuses more on comprehensive security and compliance management.
Customizable policies: FOSSA provides users with the ability to customize policies and create specific rules for vulnerability and license compliance. This allows organizations to enforce their own security and compliance standards. Snyk, while offering some degree of customization, has more limited options when it comes to policy configuration and enforcement.
Developer-centric approach: Snyk takes a more developer-centric approach with its user interface and experience. The tool emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it more accessible to developers of all skill levels. FOSSA, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich platform, which may be better suited for organizations with more complex requirements.

FOSSA vs Snyk

Overview

FOSSA vs Snyk: What are the differences?