Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CometChat vs Twilio: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the realm of communication APIs, CometChat and Twilio are two prominent platforms that offer chat and messaging services to developers. Let's explore the key differences between CometChat and Twilio.
Feature Set: CometChat primarily focuses on providing chat functionalities, including text chat, voice, and video calling, while Twilio offers a wider range of communication services, such as SMS, voice calls, video, and chat. Twilio's extensive feature set makes it a versatile platform for developers looking to integrate various communication channels into their applications.
Pricing Structure: CometChat offers a straightforward pricing model with a fixed monthly subscription fee based on the number of active users, while Twilio has a pay-as-you-go pricing structure where customers pay for specific usage like messages sent or minutes used. Twilio's flexible pricing allows developers to scale their usage based on their needs, making it a cost-effective option for businesses of all sizes.
Customization Options: Twilio provides a high level of customization and control over communication workflows through its APIs and developer tools, allowing developers to tailor the user experience to their specific requirements. CometChat, on the other hand, offers pre-built UI components and functionalities that are easy to integrate but may have limited customization options compared to Twilio.
Scalability and Performance: Twilio is known for its high scalability and reliability, handling millions of messages and calls daily without compromising performance. CometChat also offers good scalability but may not match the same level of performance and reliability as Twilio, especially for high-volume applications or enterprise-level use cases.
Documentation and Support: Twilio is well-regarded for its comprehensive documentation, extensive guides, and developer resources, making it easy for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. CometChat also provides solid documentation and support, but Twilio's resources and community support are considered more robust, offering developers a wealth of information and assistance.
Industry Focus: Twilio caters to a wide range of industries and use cases, from small startups to large enterprises, offering communication solutions for various sectors like healthcare, finance, and e-commerce. CometChat is more tailored towards specific industries such as education, gaming, and social networking, providing specialized features and functionalities for these verticals.
In Summary, when choosing between CometChat and Twilio, consider your specific communication needs, customization requirements, scalability expectations, and industry focus to determine which platform aligns best with your development goals.
Hey! We need an omnichannel inbox that's housed within Salesforce Sales Cloud that makes it super easy for our reps to respond to inbound communication (needs: clean inbox, provides historical context, etc.). We're a high-volume call center, and we get a ton of incoming SMS and email every day. We'd love a solution that lets us view all of that in one place — ideally Salesforce, as that's where our reps work, and we want to avoid needing them to switch between windows. Thanks!
if the inbound SMS are sales rep specific you could potentially have twilio fwd that msg to a google voice phone number which will in turn put an email in their inbox (so they're looking at 1 inbox instead of multiple places) Just an idea. Probably way off in left field compared to what you're thinking and I also invision. I'm not all familiar with MessageBird nor am I at all familiar w/ your data flow / business process. Would be happy to help brainstorm anytime! 10+ years experience on the sfdc platform
Check out Centro. We built this to solve this exact problem! We used tools like Twilio but wrapped it up in a application that runs on Slack.
Hello! We need to integrate an SMS gateway into our app for user phone verification. As we are just starting, we are searching for the most affordable/best price/performance option for SMS gateway to verify client phone numbers with the code, maybe you can suggest something between those two or maybe something else. We are planning to do business in Europe
Twilio is the leader. Strong API, excellent documentation and reliable service. I suggest Nexmo since their API has smaller learning curve, offering better prices and also reliable solution. Also Nexmo offers more call per sec. 3 vs 2 and 2, out of the box. Good luck
Twilio might be not cheapest, but they have awesome documentation (a lot of examples), easy to use API and libraries. I think it's a very good product to start. If the bill will become too heavy, you can shop around for economical options.
Twilio documentation is very good and as a platform it just works. It's robust and reliable. We road-tested plivo and it wasn't anywhere near in terms of docs or support. In fact their support was terrible at replying to us. 48 hours to answer basic questions.
That's said, were also using sendgrid by twilio and that's not been pleasant . Their email builder appears to be react based but written by a team who don't understand react very well. That's a nightmare as yet
stackshare doesn't seem to have this in the stack list yet, but in my experience Twillio is attractive. It's good for basics, their acquisition of SendGrid gives them a bit more market share.. They are stronger at marketing to those that benefit them. That said from my understanding SendGrid leases the networks, channels, and lines. While their interface is friendly, their pricing suited for lower volume, you want to look at what they are using via an API, a contract, etc. Is it a more friend UI to a combination of others. What redunancies do to they have, try their support. It's not that Twillio is bad, it's about the volume, the use case, the liabiitlies you might have to your end-users if Twillio isn't the right choice. Another option is Bandwidth. You ask for affordable, Twillio is an option, but front end costs v/s the costs of support you'll need to consider. Bandwidth has more reliability but requires more engineering and more skillset. Another option that is worth considering, not the most affordable, but https://www.zipwhip.com/ have perhaps options that might be higher and the cost is relative. Wight costs, of support costs of integration, cost of scale, costs of a volume..
Pros of CometChat
Pros of Twilio
- Powerful, simple, and well documented api148
- RESTful API88
- Clear pricing66
- Great sms services61
- Low cost of entry58
- Global SMS Gateway29
- Good value14
- Cloud IVR12
- Simple11
- Extremely simple to integrate with rails11
- Great for startups6
- SMS5
- Great developer program3
- Hassle free3
- Text me the app pages2
- Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy1
- Easy integration1
- Two factor authentication1
- New Features constantly rolling out1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CometChat
Cons of Twilio
- Predictable pricing4
- Expensive2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is CometChat?
What is Twilio?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use CometChat?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with CometChat?
What tools integrate with Twilio?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+25
+42
+39
+43
+39
+20