StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Email Services
  4. Email Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Litmus

BrowserStack vs Litmus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Litmus
Litmus
Stacks119
Followers111
Votes26
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533

BrowserStack vs Litmus: What are the differences?

Comparison of BrowserStack and Litmus

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between BrowserStack and Litmus, two popular tools used for browser and email testing.

  1. BrowserStack: BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that allows developers and testers to test their web applications on different browsers and operating systems. It provides a wide range of browsers and devices for testing purposes.

  2. Litmus: Litmus is an email testing and analytics tool that helps email marketers and designers to ensure the compatibility and performance of their email campaigns across different email clients, devices, and operating systems.

  3. Pricing Model: BrowserStack operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly or annual fee to access the platform and its features. On the other hand, Litmus offers both subscription-based plans and pay-as-you-go options, allowing users to choose the most suitable pricing model for their needs.

  4. Focus Area: While BrowserStack is primarily focused on browser testing, Litmus specializes in email testing and optimization. BrowserStack provides extensive browser and device coverage, allowing users to test their web applications on different browsers and operating systems. Litmus, on the other hand, provides a wide range of tools and features specifically designed for email testing and optimization.

  5. Integration Capabilities: BrowserStack offers seamless integration with popular testing frameworks and development tools, such as Selenium, Jenkins, and Jira. This integration capability allows developers to incorporate browser testing into their existing development and testing workflows. In contrast, Litmus provides integrations with popular email marketing platforms like MailChimp and Campaign Monitor, enabling users to directly test and optimize their email campaigns within these platforms.

  6. Testing Scope: The scope of testing is another significant difference between BrowserStack and Litmus. BrowserStack focuses on testing web applications across multiple browsers and platforms, allowing users to identify cross-browser compatibility issues. In contrast, Litmus focuses on testing email campaigns and ensures their compatibility across various email clients, devices, and operating systems. This includes rendering, functionality, and responsiveness of the email content.

In summary, BrowserStack is a cross-browser testing tool that specializes in testing web applications across different browsers and operating systems. Litmus, on the other hand, is an email testing and optimization tool that focuses on ensuring the compatibility and performance of email campaigns across various email clients, devices, and operating systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Litmus, BrowserStack

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Litmus
Litmus
BrowserStack
BrowserStack

Litmus is a testing service for web and marketing professionals. It allows people to cross-browser test their websites, and test their email newsletters across a range of email clients and spam filters.

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

You send us a copy of your email design, either by uploading the HTML or sending us a test email. Within a couple of minutes you'll see screenshots of your email as it's rendered by all the different email clients. Made a change? One click starts a re-test.;PREVIEW IN REAL EMAIL CLIENTS- Litmus shows you screenshots of your email newsletter as it looks across all major email clients.;CHECK ON MOBILE DEVICES- See your email on the most popular mobile devices. Litmus even lets you realistically scroll your email on the device.;EVERYTHING IN ONE PLACE- We preview your message on every major mobile device and email client.;LIGHTNING-FAST- If you're trying to fix a rendering problem in your campaign, the last thing you want is to wait for your previews. We run hundreds of servers to ensure our system is the fastest in the industry.;WORKS WITH ANY EMAIL PROVIDER- Litmus is the perfect complement to your email marketing program. As an independent company, our email testing tools are compatible with any email provider, so there's no need to switch.
Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Statistics
Stacks
119
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
111
Followers
2.0K
Votes
26
Votes
533
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Support for tons of email clients
  • 5
    Works fast
  • 4
    Great free trial offer
  • 4
    Review what the user sees
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Integrations
Mailchimp
Mailchimp
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab

What are some alternatives to Litmus, BrowserStack?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana