StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Jenkins

BrowserStack vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K

BrowserStack vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

BrowserStack and Jenkins are both widely used tools in software development, but they serve different purposes. This article will outline the key differences between BrowserStack and Jenkins, focusing on six specific aspects.

  1. Deployment Approach: BrowserStack is a cloud-based platform that allows developers to test their websites and applications on various browsers and devices. It provides a virtual infrastructure where users can simulate real-world scenarios. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source automation server that facilitates the continuous integration and delivery of software projects. It helps in building, testing, and deploying applications.

  2. Scope of Functionality: Although both tools contribute to the software development lifecycle, BrowserStack is primarily focused on testing and quality assurance. It enables developers to conduct compatibility tests on various browsers and devices, ensuring that the application functions correctly in different environments. On the contrary, Jenkins is more versatile and can be used for multiple purposes, including building, testing, and deploying applications.

  3. Platform Accessibility: BrowserStack is a cloud-based tool that provides easy accessibility across different platforms. It eliminates the need for setting up local test environments and allows developers to perform testing on real browsers and devices from any location. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires installation and configuration on local servers, limiting accessibility to on-premises environments.

  4. User Interface: BrowserStack offers a user-friendly interface with a visually appealing dashboard that allows users to perform testing tasks effortlessly. It provides features like real-time screen sharing, parallel testing, and network throttling for a seamless testing experience. Jenkins, on the other hand, has a more technical and command-line-driven interface, which may require some learning curve for users who are not familiar with it.

  5. Integration Capabilities: BrowserStack offers seamless integration with popular development and testing tools, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows. It supports integrations with tools like Jira, Jenkins, GitHub, and Selenium, allowing users to seamlessly sync their projects and test results. Jenkins, being an automation server, provides extensive integration capabilities by supporting a wide range of plugins and tools.

  6. Scalability and Cost: BrowserStack provides an on-demand scalable infrastructure, allowing users to test their applications on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously. The cost is typically based on the usage and the number of parallel test sessions required. Jenkins, being an open-source tool, offers scalability by leveraging additional server resources. However, the cost associated with Jenkins is generally related to the infrastructure and maintenance of local servers.

In summary, BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform focused on web and application compatibility, while Jenkins is an open-source automation server used for building, testing, and deploying software projects. BrowserStack offers easy accessibility, a user-friendly interface, and seamless integrations, while Jenkins is versatile and allows extensive customization. The choice between these tools depends on the specific needs and requirements of the development and testing processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Jenkins

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments
Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Jenkins
Jenkins

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
59.2K
Followers
2.0K
Followers
50.4K
Votes
533
Votes
2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
Gradle
Gradle
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Jenkins?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana