AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Fly vs Hipache

Overview

Hipache

Stacks6

Followers11

Votes5

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

Stacks12.8K

Followers8.8K

Votes59

Fly

Stacks89

Followers47

Votes14

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Fly vs Hipache: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Fly, and Hipache.

Supported Platforms: AWS ELB is a service provided by Amazon Web Services and is specific to their infrastructure, offering seamless integration with other AWS services. Fly is a global application platform that can be used on any cloud provider or on-premise servers. Hipache, on the other hand, is an open-source project that can be run on any server with Redis installed.
Load Balancing Algorithms: AWS ELB offers several load balancing algorithms such as round-robin, least connections, and IP hash. Fly customizes load balancing based on a mixture of capability and algorithm, offering more flexibility and control. Hipache uses a simple round-robin algorithm, which may not provide the same level of customization as the other two services.
Scalability: AWS ELB automatically scales based on traffic patterns and can handle massive amounts of traffic due to its integration with other AWS services like Auto Scaling. Fly is designed to scale automatically across regions and cloud providers to maintain reliability and performance. Hipache can scale horizontally by adding more Hipache instances but may require manual intervention for scaling compared to the other services.
Monitoring and Metrics: AWS ELB offers detailed monitoring through Amazon CloudWatch, providing insights into traffic, latency, and error rates. Fly provides real-time metrics and logging through its dashboard for better visibility into applications. Hipache may require additional tools or configurations for monitoring and metrics, as it does not offer built-in monitoring capabilities.
SSL Termination: AWS ELB supports SSL termination, allowing encryption/decryption of traffic at the load balancer level. Fly also offers SSL termination as part of its platform, ensuring secure communication between clients and servers. Hipache lacks native SSL termination support, which may require additional configurations or services for secure communication.
Cost Structure: AWS ELB has a pricing model based on the number of active connections and data processed, which can vary based on usage. Fly offers a flat-rate pricing structure with predictable costs for all users, making it easier to budget and plan for expenses. Hipache being open-source, incurs no direct costs for usage, but may require operational costs for maintenance and support.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Fly, and Hipache differ in supported platforms, load balancing algorithms, scalability, monitoring capabilities, SSL termination, and cost structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hipache	AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)	Fly
Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.	With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.	Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.
-	Distribution of requests to Amazon EC2 instances (servers) in multiple Availability Zones so that the risk of overloading one single instance is minimized. And if an entire Availability Zone goes offline, Elastic Load Balancing routes traffic to instances in other Availability Zones.;Continuous monitoring of the health of Amazon EC2 instances registered with the load balancer so that requests are sent only to the healthy instances. If an instance becomes unhealthy, Elastic Load Balancing stops sending traffic to that instance and spreads the load across the remaining healthy instances.;Support for end-to-end traffic encryption on those networks that use secure (HTTPS/SSL) connections.;The ability to take over the encryption and decryption work from the Amazon EC2 instances, and manage it centrally on the load balancer.;Support for the sticky session feature, which is the ability to "stick" user sessions to specific Amazon EC2 instances.;Association of the load balancer with your domain name. Because the load balancer is the only computer that is exposed to the Internet, you don’t have to create and manage public domain names for the instances that the load balancer manages. You can point the instance's domain records at the load balancer instead and scale as needed (either adding or removing capacity) without having to update the records with each scaling activity.;When used in an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC), support for creation and management of security groups associated with your load balancer to provide additional networking and security options.;Supports use of both the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).	Purpose-built cloud; CPU, memory, and storage on tap; Batteries Included Networking; Metrics and alerting
Statistics
Stacks 6	Stacks 12.8K	Stacks 89
Followers 11	Followers 8.8K	Followers 47
Votes 5	Votes 59	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Redis as backend 1 Fast 1 Easy setup	Pros 48 Easy 8 ASG integration 2 Reliability 1 Coding 0 SSL offloading	Pros 2 Service Worker 2 Extremely versatile 2 JavaScript 2 Automatic SSL via Let's Encrypt 2 Load balancer
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon EC2	Django PostgreSQL Redwood Remix Phoenix Framework Crystal Rails Rust Golang Docker

What are some alternatives to Hipache, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Fly?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Fly vs Hipache: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Fly, and Hipache.

Supported Platforms: AWS ELB is a service provided by Amazon Web Services and is specific to their infrastructure, offering seamless integration with other AWS services. Fly is a global application platform that can be used on any cloud provider or on-premise servers. Hipache, on the other hand, is an open-source project that can be run on any server with Redis installed.
Load Balancing Algorithms: AWS ELB offers several load balancing algorithms such as round-robin, least connections, and IP hash. Fly customizes load balancing based on a mixture of capability and algorithm, offering more flexibility and control. Hipache uses a simple round-robin algorithm, which may not provide the same level of customization as the other two services.
Scalability: AWS ELB automatically scales based on traffic patterns and can handle massive amounts of traffic due to its integration with other AWS services like Auto Scaling. Fly is designed to scale automatically across regions and cloud providers to maintain reliability and performance. Hipache can scale horizontally by adding more Hipache instances but may require manual intervention for scaling compared to the other services.
Monitoring and Metrics: AWS ELB offers detailed monitoring through Amazon CloudWatch, providing insights into traffic, latency, and error rates. Fly provides real-time metrics and logging through its dashboard for better visibility into applications. Hipache may require additional tools or configurations for monitoring and metrics, as it does not offer built-in monitoring capabilities.
SSL Termination: AWS ELB supports SSL termination, allowing encryption/decryption of traffic at the load balancer level. Fly also offers SSL termination as part of its platform, ensuring secure communication between clients and servers. Hipache lacks native SSL termination support, which may require additional configurations or services for secure communication.
Cost Structure: AWS ELB has a pricing model based on the number of active connections and data processed, which can vary based on usage. Fly offers a flat-rate pricing structure with predictable costs for all users, making it easier to budget and plan for expenses. Hipache being open-source, incurs no direct costs for usage, but may require operational costs for maintenance and support.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Fly, and Hipache differ in supported platforms, load balancing algorithms, scalability, monitoring capabilities, SSL termination, and cost structures.