StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Authy vs Starling

Authy vs Starling

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Authy
Authy
Stacks162
Followers174
Votes1
Starling
Starling
Stacks8
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars463
Forks59

Authy vs Starling: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Data Encryption:

Authy uses end-to-end encryption to secure user data, while Starling relies on bank-grade security protocols for data protection.

2. Multi-device Support:

Authy allows users to sync their accounts across multiple devices, enabling access to authentication codes on various platforms. Starling, on the other hand, offers limited multi-device support with fewer integration options.

3. Security Features:

Authy offers additional security features like PIN protection and biometric authentication options for added user verification. Starling focuses more on account-level security measures and transaction monitoring.

4. Integration Capabilities:

Authy provides seamless integration with a wide range of third-party services and platforms, enhancing user experience and accessibility. Starling has more limited integration capabilities and may not be as versatile in connecting with other applications.

5. Customer Support:

Authy offers extensive customer support through multiple channels, including email, phone, and online chat, ensuring timely assistance for users. Starling provides basic customer support options, potentially not as comprehensive as Authy's offerings.

6. Customization Options:

Authy allows for customization of security settings and preferences, giving users more control over their authentication methods. In contrast, Starling has fewer customization options available, limiting the personalization of security features.

In Summary, the key differences between Authy and Starling lie in data encryption, multi-device support, security features, integration capabilities, customer support, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Authy
Authy
Starling
Starling

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.

Very secure- We take security seriously. We use industry standard secure algorithms (HMAC RFC 4426) and 256 bits keys which are always encrypted at rest.;Fully redundant- The Authy API is deployed accross different PCI level 1 data-centers and it's fully redundant. We also use a DNS provider with anycast support. We've had 100% availability since 2011.;Great user experience- You connect to Authy using a transparent REST API which allows you to customize the experience you want for your users.;Fully mobile- We support any cellphone. We provide apps for all major phones (iPhone and Android) as well as text-messages for other cellphones.;No expensive & complex setups- Hardware dongles, servers, software licenses, setup costs...It's 2013, forget all that. Authy is bringing two-factor authentication to the present.
Written by Blaine Cook at Twitter;Starling is a Message Queue Server based on MemCached;Written in Ruby;Stores jobs in memory (message queue)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
463
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
59
Stacks
162
Stacks
8
Followers
174
Followers
11
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Google Authenticator-compatible
Cons
  • 2
    Terrible UI on mobile
No community feedback yet
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Authy, Starling?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase