Ackee (Analytics) vs Maze

Overview

Maze

Stacks41

Followers60

Votes5

Ackee (Analytics)

Stacks9

Followers23

Votes5

GitHub Stars4.5K

Forks384

Ackee (Analytics) vs Maze: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Ackee (Analytics) and Maze:

1. **Data Collection**: Ackee provides self-hosted analytics which means that all data collection and processing happens within your own server, ensuring data privacy and security. On the other hand, Maze is a cloud-based product, so all data is collected and stored on their servers.
   
2. **Real-time vs. Historical Data**: Ackee focuses more on providing real-time data analysis, giving you immediate insights into your website traffic and user behavior. Maze, on the other hand, focuses on historical data analysis, allowing you to dive deep into past user interactions and behaviors.

3. **Customization Options**: Ackee offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the analytics experience according to their specific requirements. Maze, while also customizable, may have limitations in terms of the depth of customization available to users.

4. **Open Source vs. Proprietary Software**: Ackee is an open-source analytics tool, meaning that users have access to the source code and can modify it according to their needs. Maze, on the other hand, is a proprietary software, restricting access to the source code and limiting modifications.

5. **Cost Structure**: Ackee is typically a more cost-effective option for businesses that prefer self-hosted solutions as it involves one-time setup costs and minimal ongoing expenses. In contrast, Maze follows a subscription-based model, which can be more suitable for businesses looking for a hassle-free analytics solution with regular updates and support.

6. **User Interface**: Ackee provides a clean and minimalist user interface, focusing on essential data points and metrics. Maze, on the other hand, offers a more visually appealing and modern interface, with detailed visualizations and reports for data analysis.

In Summary, Ackee and Maze differ in their approach to data collection, real-time analysis, customization options, software type, cost structure, and user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Maze	Ackee (Analytics)
Maze empowers product and marketing teams to test anything from prototypes to copy, or round up user feedback—all in one place. Rapidly collect user insights across teams and create better user experiences, together.	Self-hosted, Node.js based analytics tool for those who care about privacy. Ackee runs on your own server, analyses the traffic of your websites and provides useful statistics in a minimal interface.
InVision Analytics; Prototype testing; Clicks Heatmap; Painless tester gathering; Easy split testing	Self-hosted; Lightweight and easy to install; Modern and fast architecture; Beautiful and focused interface; No unique user tracking and no cookies; Fully documented API
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 384
Stacks 41	Stacks 9
Followers 60	Followers 23
Votes 5	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Makes validating protos easier 2 Easy export and setup	Pros 1 Alternative to Google Analytics 1 Self-hosted 1 Privacy focused 1 Free and open-source 1 Minimal and focused interface
Integrations
InVision Figma Adobe XD Sketch Marvel	Node.js Yarn MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Maze, Ackee (Analytics)?

Google Analytics

Google Analytics lets you measure your advertising ROI as well as track your Flash, video, and social networking sites and applications.

Mixpanel

Mixpanel helps companies build better products through data. With our powerful, self-serve product analytics solution, teams can easily analyze how and why people engage, convert, and retain to improve their user experience.

Piwik

Matomo (formerly Piwik) is a full-featured PHP MySQL software program that you download and install on your own webserver. At the end of the five-minute installation process, you will be given a JavaScript code.

Clicky

Clicky Web Analytics gives bloggers and smaller web sites a more personal understanding of their visitors. Clicky has various features that helps stand it apart from the competition specifically Spy and RSS feeds that allow web site owners to get live information about their visitors.

Plausible

It is a lightweight and open-source website analytics tool. It doesn’t use cookies and is fully compliant with GDPR, CCPA and PECR.

Databricks

Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, from the original creators of Apache Spark™, unifies data science and engineering across the Machine Learning lifecycle from data preparation to experimentation and deployment of ML applications.

userTrack

userTrack is now called UXWizz. Get access to better insights, a faster dashboard and increase user privacy. It provides detailed visitor insights without relying on third-parties.

Quickmetrics

It is a service for collecting, analyzing and visualizing custom metrics. It can be used to track anything from signups to server response times. Sending events is super simple.

Matomo

It is a web analytics platform designed to give you the conclusive insights with our complete range of features. You can also evaluate the full user-experience of your visitor’s behaviour with its Conversion Optimization features, including Heatmaps, Sessions Recordings, Funnels, Goals, Form Analytics and A/B Testing.

Volument

Volument is a new take on analytics: it focuses solely on conversion optimization and leaves out everything else. To be launched in 2020, it aims to change the way people measure and optimize their websites.

Related Comparisons

Ackee (Analytics) vs Maze: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Ackee (Analytics) and Maze:

1. **Data Collection**: Ackee provides self-hosted analytics which means that all data collection and processing happens within your own server, ensuring data privacy and security. On the other hand, Maze is a cloud-based product, so all data is collected and stored on their servers.
   
2. **Real-time vs. Historical Data**: Ackee focuses more on providing real-time data analysis, giving you immediate insights into your website traffic and user behavior. Maze, on the other hand, focuses on historical data analysis, allowing you to dive deep into past user interactions and behaviors.

3. **Customization Options**: Ackee offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the analytics experience according to their specific requirements. Maze, while also customizable, may have limitations in terms of the depth of customization available to users.

4. **Open Source vs. Proprietary Software**: Ackee is an open-source analytics tool, meaning that users have access to the source code and can modify it according to their needs. Maze, on the other hand, is a proprietary software, restricting access to the source code and limiting modifications.

5. **Cost Structure**: Ackee is typically a more cost-effective option for businesses that prefer self-hosted solutions as it involves one-time setup costs and minimal ongoing expenses. In contrast, Maze follows a subscription-based model, which can be more suitable for businesses looking for a hassle-free analytics solution with regular updates and support.

6. **User Interface**: Ackee provides a clean and minimalist user interface, focusing on essential data points and metrics. Maze, on the other hand, offers a more visually appealing and modern interface, with detailed visualizations and reports for data analysis.

In Summary, Ackee and Maze differ in their approach to data collection, real-time analysis, customization options, software type, cost structure, and user interface design.

Ackee (Analytics) vs Maze

Overview