Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Solano CI vs Test Kitchen: What are the differences?
Developers describe Solano CI as "Massively Scalable Continuous Integration and Deployment". Faster Continuous Integration and Deployment with patented auto-parallelization. See results 10 to 80x faster. 14-day free trial. No credit card required. On the other hand, Test Kitchen is detailed as "Integration tool for developing and testing infrastructure code and software on isolated target platforms". Test Kitchen has a static, declarative configuration in a .kitchen.yml file at the root of your project. It is designed to execute isolated code run in pristine environments ensuring that no prior state exists. A plugin architecture gives you the freedom to run your code on any cloud, virtualization, or bare metal resources and allows you to write acceptance criteria in whatever framework you desire.
Solano CI and Test Kitchen can be categorized as "Continuous Integration" tools.
"Uber-fast highly customizable parallel builds" is the primary reason why developers consider Solano CI over the competitors, whereas "Automated testing" was stated as the key factor in picking Test Kitchen.
Test Kitchen is an open source tool with 1.62K GitHub stars and 543 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Test Kitchen's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Solano CI
- Uber-fast highly customizable parallel builds10
- Awesome support and easy to integrate!7
- Github integration and automatic branch tracking7
- Integration with AWS Code Pipeline3
- Powerful and flexible with super helpful service2
Pros of Test Kitchen
- Automated testing6
- Detect bugs in cook books4
- Integrates well with vagrant2
- Can containerise tests in Docker2
- Integrates well with puppet1