StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Uploads
  5. Shrine vs Transloadit vs Uppy

Shrine vs Transloadit vs Uppy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Transloadit
Transloadit
Stacks36
Followers46
Votes26
Shrine
Shrine
Stacks13
Followers23
Votes0
Uppy
Uppy
Stacks92
Followers142
Votes6
GitHub Stars30.4K
Forks2.1K

Shrine vs Transloadit vs Uppy: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Shrine, Transloadit, and Uppy - three popular tools used for handling file uploads in web development.

1. **Architecture**: Shrine is a modern file attachment library, Transloadit is a processing platform for file uploads, and Uppy is a sleek file uploader. Shrine is flexible, allowing developers to choose the storage, processing, and validation plugins they want. Transloadit, on the other hand, provides a cloud service that handles file processing and encoding, supporting a wide range of input sources. Uppy is a sleek uploader designed for user-friendly file uploads with various integrations and plugins available.

2. **Customization**: Shrine offers a high level of customization, letting developers tailor the file upload process to their specific needs. Transloadit allows for advanced customization through the use of Assembly Instructions, enabling developers to create complex file processing workflows. Uppy offers customization options through its plugin system, allowing developers to extend its functionality with ease.

3. **Ease of Use**: Shrine aims for simplicity and ease of use, providing a straightforward API for file uploading and processing. Transloadit offers a user-friendly dashboard for managing file processing tasks and monitoring the progress of uploads. Uppy focuses on providing a smooth and user-friendly file uploading experience for end-users, with a clean UI and intuitive design.

4. **Integration**: Shrine integrates smoothly with various storage services, processing libraries, and validation tools, making it a versatile choice for file uploads. Transloadit seamlessly integrates with cloud storage providers and offers SDKs for popular programming languages, simplifying integration into existing projects. Uppy integrates well with popular frontend frameworks and provides plugins for adding additional features like drag-and-drop functionality.

5. **Community Support**: Shrine has a growing community of developers contributing plugins and providing support through forums and documentation. Transloadit has an active community and support team, offering assistance with integrating their platform and troubleshooting any issues. Uppy has a community of users actively contributing feedback, plugins, and enhancements to improve the overall experience.

6. **Pricing Model**: Shrine is an open-source library with no direct costs associated with it, making it a cost-effective option for developers. Transloadit offers a variety of pricing plans based on usage, with a free tier available for small projects. Uppy is also open-source and free to use, making it a budget-friendly choice for developers.

In Summary, this Markdown code highlights key differences between Shrine, Transloadit, and Uppy in terms of architecture, customization, ease of use, integration, community support, and pricing models when it comes to handling file uploads in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Transloadit
Transloadit
Shrine
Shrine
Uppy
Uppy

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

Handles file uploads & importing;Video & audio encoding;Image manipulation;Document conversion;Handles zip files and many other archives;Export to your own storage;Safe and Secure;Orchestrate powerful workflows;Easy to integrate;Analyze activity;Save money
-
React (Native) support (planned);ES6;Modular setup;Drag & Drop;Aware of encoding/processing; Copy & Paste; Encoding; Resumable File Uploads; Themable, with a beautiful default;Webcam;Import from Dropbox; Import from Google Drive; Import from Instagram
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
30.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
36
Stacks
13
Stacks
92
Followers
46
Followers
23
Followers
142
Votes
26
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Highly customizable
  • 5
    Incredible customer support
  • 4
    So simple and powerful
  • 2
    Easy integration with most languages
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Open Source & Self Hosted
  • 3
    Copy & Paste support
Cons
  • 1
    Takes time to configure
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Node.js
Node.js
Heroku
Heroku
Zapier
Zapier
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
Rackspace Cloud Files
Rackspace Cloud Files
tus.io
tus.io
Ruby
Ruby
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Dropbox
Dropbox
Google Drive
Google Drive

What are some alternatives to Transloadit, Shrine, Uppy?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Bytescale

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Filestack

Filestack

Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.

CarrierWave

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

FilePond

FilePond

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

tus.io

tus.io

Open protocol for resumable file uploads

Flatfile

Flatfile

The drop-in data importer that implements in hours, not weeks. Give your users the import experience you always dreamed of, but never had time to build.

CameraTag

CameraTag

With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>

jQuery File Upload

jQuery File Upload

It is a File Upload widget with multiple file selection, drag&drop support, progress bar, validation and preview images, audio and video for jQuery. Supports cross-domain, chunked and resumable file uploads. Works with any server-side platform (Google App Engine, PHP, Python, Ruby on Rails, Java, etc.) that supports standard HTML form file uploads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase