Postman vs Zapier

Overview

Zapier

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.2K

Votes114

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

Postman vs Zapier: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Postman and Zapier. Postman is an API development tool, while Zapier is an automation tool that connects various applications.

Integration Capabilities: Postman primarily focuses on API testing and development, providing a comprehensive set of tools for analyzing, debugging, and documenting APIs. In contrast, Zapier specializes in integrating different apps and automating workflows, allowing users to connect and streamline processes across various platforms.
Workflow Automation vs API Testing: Zapier excels in workflow automation by providing a user-friendly interface where users can create "Zaps" to connect and automate tasks between different apps, without the need for coding knowledge. Postman, on the other hand, is designed for API testing and debugging, with advanced features like request generation, response inspection, and comprehensive test suites.
User Interface: Postman offers a rich and powerful user interface specifically tailored for API development, including features like API documentation, code snippets generation, and easy collaboration with team members. Zapier, being an automation tool, prioritizes simplicity and ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface that enables non-technical users to create complex automated tasks effortlessly.
Scalability: Postman is designed to handle and manage the complexities of API development, allowing for advanced testing scenarios, performance monitoring, and collaboration features suitable for teams of developers. Zapier, while also accommodating teams, is more focused on simplifying and automating repetitive tasks for individual users or small teams.
Pricing and Usage: Postman has both free and paid versions, with different tiers offering additional features and support. Zapier, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on usage and automation requirements.
Target Audience: Postman caters primarily to developers, providing them with a comprehensive set of tools and features to build, test, and document APIs. Zapier, on the other hand, is aimed at individuals and small-to-medium-sized businesses that want to automate repetitive tasks between different applications without the need for extensive development work.

In Summary, Postman is a robust API development tool, while Zapier is an automation tool that connects various apps and simplifies workflow automation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zapier, Postman

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

Yisroel

Jul 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Mailchimp

QuickBooks

Tray.io

Hey! We are Raisegiving, a payments platform geared towards helping nonprofits raise money and manage donors. We are looking to give our Users (Admins of nonprofits) the ability to integrate their Raisegiving account with other tools such as Mailchimp and QuickBooks.

Examples of desired use cases:

Users should be able to sync Raisegiving audience with their Mailchimp audience, trigger the creation of a new Mailchimp audience based on data from their Raisegiving account.
Donations made on our platform should sync with users Quickbooks account.

Does anyone have any helpful insights into the pros and cons of Tray.io vs Zapier?

111k views111k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zapier	Postman
Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.	It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
A Zap is a blueprint for a task you want to do over and over. In words, a Zap looks like this: "When I get a new thing in A, do this other thing in B." The first part is the trigger and the second part is the action. An example is "When I get a new entry from a Wufoo form, create a new lead in Salesforce.";You can pick what fields from the trigger service should go to the action service and you can use static text and custom fields too. For instance, you might say that the phone number from your Wufoo form should be the work phone of your new Salesforce lead.;Zapier regularly checks your trigger for new data. When the Zap triggers, Zapier automatically performs your action for you. Continuing with the Wufoo scenario, say you receive five new entries. Zapier takes each one and makes a new lead in Salesforce, customized to the way you specified in your Zap.;Without any more effort from you, data flows from one service to the other	Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
Statistics
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 96.1K
Followers 1.2K	Followers 82.5K
Votes 114	Votes 1.8K
Pros & Cons
Pros 45 Sync cloud services 34 Easy setup 15 Scheduled tasks 8 Great customer support 6 Integrates with Trello	Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive
Integrations
No integrations available	HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps

What are some alternatives to Zapier, Postman?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

IFTTT

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Postman vs Zapier: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Postman and Zapier. Postman is an API development tool, while Zapier is an automation tool that connects various applications.

Integration Capabilities: Postman primarily focuses on API testing and development, providing a comprehensive set of tools for analyzing, debugging, and documenting APIs. In contrast, Zapier specializes in integrating different apps and automating workflows, allowing users to connect and streamline processes across various platforms.
Workflow Automation vs API Testing: Zapier excels in workflow automation by providing a user-friendly interface where users can create "Zaps" to connect and automate tasks between different apps, without the need for coding knowledge. Postman, on the other hand, is designed for API testing and debugging, with advanced features like request generation, response inspection, and comprehensive test suites.
User Interface: Postman offers a rich and powerful user interface specifically tailored for API development, including features like API documentation, code snippets generation, and easy collaboration with team members. Zapier, being an automation tool, prioritizes simplicity and ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface that enables non-technical users to create complex automated tasks effortlessly.
Scalability: Postman is designed to handle and manage the complexities of API development, allowing for advanced testing scenarios, performance monitoring, and collaboration features suitable for teams of developers. Zapier, while also accommodating teams, is more focused on simplifying and automating repetitive tasks for individual users or small teams.
Pricing and Usage: Postman has both free and paid versions, with different tiers offering additional features and support. Zapier, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on usage and automation requirements.
Target Audience: Postman caters primarily to developers, providing them with a comprehensive set of tools and features to build, test, and document APIs. Zapier, on the other hand, is aimed at individuals and small-to-medium-sized businesses that want to automate repetitive tasks between different applications without the need for extensive development work.

In Summary, Postman is a robust API development tool, while Zapier is an automation tool that connects various apps and simplifies workflow automation.