StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Wowza vs nginx

Wowza vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Wowza
Wowza
Stacks43
Followers72
Votes0

Wowza vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

Wowza and nginx are both popular media server software solutions used for streaming audio and video content over the internet. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of features and functionalities.

  1. Scalability: Wowza is known for its robust scalability, allowing users to handle a large number of concurrent connections and deliver content to a wide range of devices. It offers advanced load balancing features, adaptive streaming, and the ability to distribute streams across multiple servers. On the other hand, nginx is primarily designed as a web server with limited scalability options for media streaming purposes. It may not be as suitable for handling high traffic or delivering content to a large audience.

  2. Protocols and Formats Supported: Wowza supports a wide range of streaming protocols and video formats, including HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH), RTMP, RTSP, and more. It also provides comprehensive transcoding capabilities to convert video files into different formats. In comparison, nginx has more limited protocol support, primarily focusing on HTTP-based protocols like HLS and DASH. It may require additional modules or configurations to support other streaming protocols.

  3. Built-in Features and Functionality: Wowza offers a comprehensive set of built-in features and functionality specifically tailored for media streaming, including live streaming, video-on-demand, DVR-like capabilities, and real-time analytics. It also provides a wide range of APIs and integration options for customization and third-party services. On the other hand, nginx is a fast and lightweight web server that can be extended with additional modules for media streaming, but it may lack some specialized features and require more manual configuration for advanced functionalities.

  4. Ease of Use and User Interface: Wowza provides a user-friendly web-based management console with an intuitive interface, making it easy for users to configure and manage their media server settings. It offers a visual workflow builder and graphical user interface for managing streams, monitoring performance, and troubleshooting issues. In contrast, nginx is primarily configuration-based and may require more technical expertise to set up and manage. It often involves creating and editing configuration files directly to customize server behavior.

  5. Compatibility and Integration: Wowza is known for its extensive compatibility with different devices, platforms, and streaming clients. It offers native support for popular content delivery networks (CDNs) and can seamlessly integrate with various programming languages and frameworks. Nginx also enjoys good compatibility, but it may require additional modules or configurations to achieve similar levels of integration and interoperability.

  6. Cost and Licensing: Wowza offers both a free trial version and a paid licensing model based on the number of concurrent connections and server instances. The cost can vary significantly depending on the specific requirements and scale of usage. Nginx, on the other hand, is an open-source software distributed under the 2-clause BSD license, allowing users to use and modify the software freely without incurring any licensing costs. However, optional commercial support and add-ons may be available for a fee.

In summary, Wowza and nginx differ in terms of scalability, protocol support, built-in features, ease of use, compatibility, and licensing. Wowza excels in terms of scalability, comprehensive features, and ease of use for media streaming purposes, while nginx is a fast and lightweight web server that may require more manual configuration and additional modules for advanced streaming functionalities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Wowza

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Kerry
Kerry

Apr 23, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon S3Amazon S3DockerDockerWowzaWowza

We would like to connect a number of (about 25) video streams, from an Amazon S3 bucket containing video data to endpoints accessible to a Docker image, which, when run, will process the input video streams and emit some JSON statistics.

The 25 video streams should be synchronized. Could people share their experiences with a similar scenario and perhaps offer advice about which is better (Wowza, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams) for this kind of problem, or why they chose one technology over the other?

The video stream duration will be quite long (about 8 hours each x 25 camera sources). The 25 video streams will have no audio component. If you worked with a similar problem, what was your experience with scaling, latency, resource requirements, config, etc.?

88.9k views88.9k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Wowza
Wowza

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It offers a customizable live streaming platform to build, deploy and manage high-quality video, live and on-demand. It powers professional-grade streaming for any use case and any device.

-
Cloud Streaming Services; Streaming Server Software
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
43
Followers
61.9K
Followers
72
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
WordPress
WordPress

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Wowza?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase