Overview

Netlify

Stacks3.4K

Followers2.1K

Votes207

CoreRender

Stacks57

Followers55

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.2K

Forks96

Netlify vs Render: What are the differences?

Pricing: One key difference between Netlify and Render is their pricing model. Netlify offers a free tier with limited features and resources, making it suitable for small projects and personal websites. On the other hand, Render provides a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay for the actual resources they consume. This makes Render a more cost-effective option for larger projects and websites with higher traffic.
Deployment Options: Netlify focuses primarily on static site hosting and offers seamless integration with Git workflows. It automatically builds and deploys sites when changes are pushed to a connected repository. In contrast, Render offers a wider range of deployment options, supporting both static and dynamic websites, as well as serverless functions and databases. This flexibility makes Render a better choice for complex web applications that require more than just hosting static files.
Automatic Scaling: Render provides automatic scaling for both web servers and databases. It dynamically adjusts the resources allocated based on the traffic and load, ensuring optimal performance and cost-efficiency. Netlify, on the other hand, does not offer automatic scaling for their hosting service, making it less suitable for websites that experience fluctuating traffic and require on-demand resource allocation.
Serverless Functions: Render has built-in support for serverless functions and allows developers to easily deploy and run serverless code alongside their web applications. This eliminates the need for separate infrastructure and simplifies the development process. Netlify also supports serverless functions, but it requires additional configuration and setup compared to Render's seamless integration.
Collaboration and Access Control: Netlify offers more robust collaboration and access control features, making it easier for teams to work together on projects. It allows multiple team members to have different levels of access and provides a user-friendly interface for managing permissions. Render, on the other hand, has more limited collaboration capabilities and does not offer granular access control features. This makes Netlify a better choice for teams working on larger projects with multiple contributors.
Managed Databases: Render offers managed PostgreSQL and MySQL databases as part of their services. This means that users don't have to set up and manage their own database instances, reducing the administrative overhead. Netlify, on the other hand, does not provide managed databases as part of their hosting service. Users would need to set up and maintain their own database infrastructure separately.

In Summary, Netlify and Render differ in pricing models, deployment options, automatic scaling, serverless function support, collaboration features, and provision of managed databases.

Advice on Netlify, CoreRender

Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

Decidedon

Netlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Netlify	CoreRender
Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.	React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs.
Global Network;Global Network;Instant Cache Validation;Atomic Deploys;API proxying;SSL for custom domains;Continuous Deployment;Link to Github or Bitbucket	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 96
Stacks 3.4K	Stacks 57
Followers 2.1K	Followers 55
Votes 207	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 47 Easy deploy 43 Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments 22 Free SSL support 22 Super simple deploys 15 Easy Setup and Continous deployments Cons 7 It's expensive 1 Bandwidth limitation	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket	React Swift

What are some alternatives to Netlify, CoreRender?

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.