NativeScript vs UIkIt

Overview

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

NativeScript

Stacks533

Followers1.1K

Votes516

GitHub Stars25.3K

Forks1.7K

NativeScript vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Difference Between NativeScript and UIkIt

Mobile vs Web Development: The key difference between NativeScript and UIkIt lies in their primary focus - while NativeScript is geared towards mobile app development, UIkIt is aimed at web development. NativeScript allows developers to create native apps for iOS and Android using a single codebase, whereas UIkIt is used for designing responsive web interfaces.
Technology Stack: Another major difference is in their technology stack. NativeScript uses JavaScript, Angular, or Vue.js to build mobile applications, while UIkIt is based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for creating web interfaces. This difference in technology stack also affects the level of customization and integration options available in each framework.
Target Platforms: In terms of target platforms, NativeScript is mainly focused on building native mobile applications for iOS and Android, providing access to device-specific APIs. In contrast, UIkIt is designed for creating responsive web designs that work across different browsers and screen sizes, ensuring a consistent user experience on the web.
Performance Optimization: NativeScript is optimized for performance on mobile devices, utilizing native UI components to provide a seamless user experience. UIkIt, on the other hand, prioritizes responsive design principles for web interfaces, ensuring that the layout adapts to different screen sizes and devices.
Development Environment: NativeScript offers a command-line interface (CLI) for developing and building mobile apps, with support for popular code editors like Visual Studio Code. In contrast, UIkIt can be easily integrated into web projects using a CDN or a package manager like npm, making it more accessible for web developers working on front-end projects.
Community and Support: The NativeScript community is focused on mobile app development, providing resources, plugins, and documentation tailored to that specific domain. UIkIt, being a popular front-end framework, has a vibrant community of web developers contributing to its growth, with a wide range of themes, components, and templates available for creating modern web interfaces.

In Summary, NativeScript is a mobile development framework for building native cross-platform applications, while UIkIt is a front-end framework for web development focused on creating responsive user interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on UIkIt, NativeScript

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt	NativeScript
UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.	NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.
LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.	100% Access to Native Platform API;NativeScript is free of charge as an open source project;Code with JavaScript. Style with CSS;Cross-platform UI abstractions;Shared business logic and data models
Statistics
GitHub Stars 18.5K	GitHub Stars 25.3K
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 1.7K
Stacks 791	Stacks 533
Followers 417	Followers 1.1K
Votes 262	Votes 516
Pros & Cons
Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Functional 24 Easy to learn	Pros 75 Access to the entire native api 47 Support for native ios and android libraries 46 Support for javascript libraries 46 Angular 2.0 support 44 Native ux and performance Cons 5 Lack of promotion 1 Slower Performance compared to competitors

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, NativeScript?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Related Comparisons

NativeScript vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Difference Between NativeScript and UIkIt

Mobile vs Web Development: The key difference between NativeScript and UIkIt lies in their primary focus - while NativeScript is geared towards mobile app development, UIkIt is aimed at web development. NativeScript allows developers to create native apps for iOS and Android using a single codebase, whereas UIkIt is used for designing responsive web interfaces.
Technology Stack: Another major difference is in their technology stack. NativeScript uses JavaScript, Angular, or Vue.js to build mobile applications, while UIkIt is based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for creating web interfaces. This difference in technology stack also affects the level of customization and integration options available in each framework.
Target Platforms: In terms of target platforms, NativeScript is mainly focused on building native mobile applications for iOS and Android, providing access to device-specific APIs. In contrast, UIkIt is designed for creating responsive web designs that work across different browsers and screen sizes, ensuring a consistent user experience on the web.
Performance Optimization: NativeScript is optimized for performance on mobile devices, utilizing native UI components to provide a seamless user experience. UIkIt, on the other hand, prioritizes responsive design principles for web interfaces, ensuring that the layout adapts to different screen sizes and devices.
Development Environment: NativeScript offers a command-line interface (CLI) for developing and building mobile apps, with support for popular code editors like Visual Studio Code. In contrast, UIkIt can be easily integrated into web projects using a CDN or a package manager like npm, making it more accessible for web developers working on front-end projects.
Community and Support: The NativeScript community is focused on mobile app development, providing resources, plugins, and documentation tailored to that specific domain. UIkIt, being a popular front-end framework, has a vibrant community of web developers contributing to its growth, with a wide range of themes, components, and templates available for creating modern web interfaces.

NativeScript vs UIkIt

Overview

NativeScript vs UIkIt: What are the differences?