StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Mesosphere vs OpenShift

Mesosphere vs OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
Stacks80
Followers108
Votes6

Mesosphere vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Scalability: Mesosphere is known for its ability to efficiently manage large-scale clusters and support thousands of nodes, making it ideal for enterprises with complex and demanding workloads. On the other hand, OpenShift focuses on providing scalability through its Kubernetes-based container orchestration platform, allowing users to effortlessly scale applications across multiple environments.

2. Platform Support: Mesosphere offers a versatile platform that supports a wide range of frameworks, including Docker containers, Apache Spark, and Apache Kafka. In contrast, OpenShift primarily focuses on providing support for Kubernetes-based applications, creating a more streamlined and standardized environment for containerized workloads.

3. Use Cases: Mesosphere is commonly used for managing various types of workloads, such as Big Data analytics and real-time stream processing, which require advanced resource management capabilities. OpenShift, on the other hand, is often employed for deploying cloud-native applications and microservices, leveraging its robust container orchestration features for efficient deployment and scaling.

4. Data Management: Mesosphere incorporates a sophisticated data management layer that enables seamless integration with data-intensive applications and distributed storage systems. In comparison, OpenShift tends to focus more on application deployment and management, with less emphasis on comprehensive data management functionalities.

5. Customization Options: Mesosphere provides extensive customization options for users to tailor their cluster configurations and resource allocation based on specific needs and preferences. OpenShift, while offering some degree of customization, is more streamlined in its approach, aiming to simplify container orchestration tasks and configuration processes for users.

6. Community Ecosystem: Mesosphere has a robust community ecosystem that actively contributes to the development and enhancement of the platform, offering additional resources and support to users. OpenShift, being a product of Red Hat, benefits from a strong enterprise support system and a dedicated community of users and developers focused on improving the platform's capabilities and features.

In Summary, Mesosphere and OpenShift differ in scalability, platform support, use cases, data management, customization options, and community ecosystem, catering to distinct needs and preferences within the realm of container orchestration and management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Mesosphere
Mesosphere

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
Built on top of open source technology;Grow to tens of thousands of nodes effortlessly while dynamically allocating resources with ease.;Mesosphere keeps your apps running by rebalancing resources and restarting failed tasks automatically.;Mesosphere packs each server with multiple apps, increasing resource utilization.;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
80
Followers
1.4K
Followers
108
Votes
517
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 6
    Devops
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Docker
Docker
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Mesosphere?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot