Mesosphere vs Red Hat OpenShift

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Mesosphere

80
108
+ 1
6
Red Hat OpenShift

1.5K
1.4K
+ 1
517
Add tool

Mesosphere vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Scalability: Mesosphere is known for its ability to efficiently manage large-scale clusters and support thousands of nodes, making it ideal for enterprises with complex and demanding workloads. On the other hand, OpenShift focuses on providing scalability through its Kubernetes-based container orchestration platform, allowing users to effortlessly scale applications across multiple environments.

2. Platform Support: Mesosphere offers a versatile platform that supports a wide range of frameworks, including Docker containers, Apache Spark, and Apache Kafka. In contrast, OpenShift primarily focuses on providing support for Kubernetes-based applications, creating a more streamlined and standardized environment for containerized workloads.

3. Use Cases: Mesosphere is commonly used for managing various types of workloads, such as Big Data analytics and real-time stream processing, which require advanced resource management capabilities. OpenShift, on the other hand, is often employed for deploying cloud-native applications and microservices, leveraging its robust container orchestration features for efficient deployment and scaling.

4. Data Management: Mesosphere incorporates a sophisticated data management layer that enables seamless integration with data-intensive applications and distributed storage systems. In comparison, OpenShift tends to focus more on application deployment and management, with less emphasis on comprehensive data management functionalities.

5. Customization Options: Mesosphere provides extensive customization options for users to tailor their cluster configurations and resource allocation based on specific needs and preferences. OpenShift, while offering some degree of customization, is more streamlined in its approach, aiming to simplify container orchestration tasks and configuration processes for users.

6. Community Ecosystem: Mesosphere has a robust community ecosystem that actively contributes to the development and enhancement of the platform, offering additional resources and support to users. OpenShift, being a product of Red Hat, benefits from a strong enterprise support system and a dedicated community of users and developers focused on improving the platform's capabilities and features.

In Summary, Mesosphere and OpenShift differ in scalability, platform support, use cases, data management, customization options, and community ecosystem, catering to distinct needs and preferences within the realm of container orchestration and management.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Mesosphere
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
  • 6
    Devops
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
  • 32
    Custom domains
  • 28
    Mongodb support
  • 27
    Clean and simple architecture
  • 25
    PHP support
  • 21
    Customizable environments
  • 11
    Ability to run CRON jobs
  • 9
    Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog
  • 8
    Easy deployment
  • 7
    PostgreSQL support
  • 7
    Autoscaling
  • 7
    Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility
  • 5
    Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear
  • 4
    Shell access to gears
  • 3
    Great Support
  • 3
    High Security
  • 3
    Logging & Metrics
  • 2
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 2
    Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure
  • 2
    No credit card needed
  • 2
    Because it is easy to manage
  • 2
    Secure
  • 2
    Meteor support
  • 2
    Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e
  • 2
    Golang support
  • 2
    Its free and offer custom domain usage
  • 1
    Autoscaling at a good price point
  • 1
    Easy setup and great customer support
  • 1
    MultiCloud
  • 1
    Great free plan with excellent support
  • 1
    This is the only free one among the three as of today

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Mesosphere
Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
    • 2
      License cost
    • 1
      Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Mesosphere?

    Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

    What is Red Hat OpenShift?

    OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Mesosphere and Red Hat OpenShift as a desired skillset
    What companies use Mesosphere?
    What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Mesosphere?
    What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2740
    Node.jsnpmKubernetes+6
    1
    1597
    What are some alternatives to Mesosphere and Red Hat OpenShift?
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Rancher
    Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
    Apache Mesos
    Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.
    CoreOS
    It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.
    Cloud Foundry
    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
    See all alternatives