Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Maven

2.8K
1.7K
+ 1
414
Mill

3
4
+ 1
0
Add tool

Apache Maven vs Mill: What are the differences?

  1. Dependency Management: Apache Maven is a build automation tool known for its strong dependency management capabilities. It uses a declarative approach for managing dependencies through its Project Object Model (POM). On the other hand, Mill is a build tool that focuses on simplicity and speed. While it also supports dependency management, it uses a more flexible approach that allows developers to define dependencies using Scala code directly.
  2. Build Configuration: Maven relies on XML-based configuration for defining the build process. It uses a predefined set of lifecycle phases and plugins to perform various build tasks. Mill, on the other hand, uses a Scala-based configuration DSL. It provides a concise and expressive way to define build tasks and dependencies.
  3. Incremental Compilation: Maven does not have built-in support for incremental compilation. It typically recompiles the entire project even if only a small part of the code has changed. Mill, on the other hand, has built-in support for incremental compilation. It only recompiles the modified files, resulting in faster build times for larger projects.
  4. Language Support: Maven is primarily used for Java projects and has strong support for Java libraries and frameworks. It also supports other JVM languages like Groovy and Scala. Mill, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Scala projects. It provides seamless integration with Scala and its ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for Scala developers.
  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Maven has a large and mature plugin ecosystem, with thousands of plugins available for various build and deployment tasks. These plugins can be easily added to a Maven project using the POM configuration. Mill, on the other hand, has a relatively smaller plugin ecosystem. While it does have some plugins available, it may not have the same breadth as Maven.
  6. Concurrency: Maven uses a single-threaded approach for executing build tasks. This means that the build process is executed sequentially, one task at a time. Mill, on the other hand, supports concurrent execution of build tasks. This allows for faster and more efficient builds, especially in multi-module projects.

In Summary, Apache Maven and Mill have key differences in terms of dependency management, build configuration, incremental compilation, language support, plugin ecosystem, and concurrency.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache Maven
Pros of Mill
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
  • 18
    Modularisation
  • 11
    Consistency across builds
  • 6
    Prevents overengineering using scripting
  • 4
    Runs Tests
  • 4
    Lot of cool plugins
  • 3
    Extensible
  • 2
    Hard to customize
  • 2
    Runs on Linux
  • 1
    Runs on OS X
  • 1
    Slow incremental build
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 1
    Undeterminisc
  • 1
    Good IDE tooling
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Apache Maven
    Cons of Mill
    • 6
      Complex
    • 1
      Inconsistent buillds
    • 0
      Not many plugin-alternatives
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Apache Maven?

      Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

      What is Mill?

      It is your shiny new Java/Scala build tool. It aims for simplicity by re-using concepts you are already familiar with, borrowing ideas from modern tools like Bazel, to let you build your projects in a way that's simple, fast, and predictable.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Apache Maven?
      What companies use Mill?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Apache Maven or Mill.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Apache Maven?
        What tools integrate with Mill?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        What are some alternatives to Apache Maven and Mill?
        Jira
        Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.
        Jenkins
        In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
        Gradle
        Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.
        Apache Ant
        Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.
        Apache Tomcat
        Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
        See all alternatives