Mattermost vs Zoho Cliq

Overview

Mattermost

Stacks480

Followers582

Votes302

Zoho Cliq

Stacks22

Followers29

Votes0

Mattermost vs Zoho Cliq: What are the differences?

User Interface: Mattermost has a more text-heavy and utilitarian interface, resembling a typical chatroom layout, with a focus on practicality and efficiency. On the other hand, Zoho Cliq features a more visually appealing and user-friendly interface with customizable themes and emojis, which may cater to users who prefer a more modern and engaging design.
Integration Capabilities: Mattermost offers a wide range of integrations with various third-party tools and services, including GitHub, Jira, and Bitbucket, allowing users to streamline their workflows and consolidate their communication channels. In contrast, Zoho Cliq has seamless integrations with other Zoho applications like Zoho CRM and Zoho Projects, providing a more cohesive and unified experience for users within the Zoho ecosystem.
Collaboration Features: Mattermost emphasizes collaboration through advanced features such as channels, threads, and mentions, facilitating organized and focused discussions within teams. On the other hand, Zoho Cliq prioritizes collaboration through features like tasks, polls, and file sharing, supporting a more structured and actionable approach to teamwork and project management.
Enterprise Security: Mattermost offers robust enterprise security features such as end-to-end encryption, compliance with data privacy regulations, and self-hosted deployment options, ideal for organizations with strict security requirements and data governance policies. Zoho Cliq, while providing essential security measures, may be more suitable for small to medium-sized businesses that do not have as stringent security needs.
Customization Options: Mattermost allows users to customize their chat experience by creating custom emojis, themes, and plugins, enabling a personalized and tailored communication environment. In contrast, Zoho Cliq offers customization through chatbots, automation workflows, and in-app extensions, enhancing productivity and efficiency by automating repetitive tasks and processes.
Mobile Experience: Mattermost provides a mobile app for iOS and Android devices, allowing users to stay connected and collaborate on the go, ensuring seamless communication regardless of location. Zoho Cliq also offers mobile apps with similar functionality, enabling users to access and manage their conversations and tasks conveniently from their smartphones or tablets.

In Summary, Mattermost and Zoho Cliq differ in terms of user interface, integration capabilities, collaboration features, enterprise security, customization options, and mobile experience, catering to different preferences and requirements in the realm of team communication and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Mattermost, Zoho Cliq

Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mattermost	Zoho Cliq
Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.	It is a business communication app that includes real-time messaging, task management and automation. You can share files and make audio or video calls, right from within your chat channels. it is loaded with features to keep teams productive and cohesive.
All your team communication in one place, searchable and accessible anywhere; Slack-compatible, not Slack-limited. Imports Slack channels, users and themes. Offers Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations including Hubot, Jenkins, GitLab and others; Self-host ready with System Console and IT admin tools for managing dozens of team sites. Installs with Linux binary, plus Docker, Heroku, AWS, Azure and Cloud Foundry options	Collaboration; Video Broadcasting for Teams; Work Remotely
Statistics
Stacks 480	Stacks 22
Followers 582	Followers 29
Votes 302	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Open source 41 On-premise deployment 26 Free 22 Built using golang 21 Fast and easy to use Cons 2 Less integrations and plugins than slack 2 Many basic features are enterprise only 2 Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise 1 Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB 1 Basic permissions only in enterprise edition	No community feedback yet
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2 Segment Jenkins GitLab Microsoft Azure Google Compute Engine Hubot Cloud Foundry Amazon SES	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Mattermost, Zoho Cliq?

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

Mattermost vs Zoho Cliq: What are the differences?

User Interface: Mattermost has a more text-heavy and utilitarian interface, resembling a typical chatroom layout, with a focus on practicality and efficiency. On the other hand, Zoho Cliq features a more visually appealing and user-friendly interface with customizable themes and emojis, which may cater to users who prefer a more modern and engaging design.
Integration Capabilities: Mattermost offers a wide range of integrations with various third-party tools and services, including GitHub, Jira, and Bitbucket, allowing users to streamline their workflows and consolidate their communication channels. In contrast, Zoho Cliq has seamless integrations with other Zoho applications like Zoho CRM and Zoho Projects, providing a more cohesive and unified experience for users within the Zoho ecosystem.
Collaboration Features: Mattermost emphasizes collaboration through advanced features such as channels, threads, and mentions, facilitating organized and focused discussions within teams. On the other hand, Zoho Cliq prioritizes collaboration through features like tasks, polls, and file sharing, supporting a more structured and actionable approach to teamwork and project management.
Enterprise Security: Mattermost offers robust enterprise security features such as end-to-end encryption, compliance with data privacy regulations, and self-hosted deployment options, ideal for organizations with strict security requirements and data governance policies. Zoho Cliq, while providing essential security measures, may be more suitable for small to medium-sized businesses that do not have as stringent security needs.
Customization Options: Mattermost allows users to customize their chat experience by creating custom emojis, themes, and plugins, enabling a personalized and tailored communication environment. In contrast, Zoho Cliq offers customization through chatbots, automation workflows, and in-app extensions, enhancing productivity and efficiency by automating repetitive tasks and processes.
Mobile Experience: Mattermost provides a mobile app for iOS and Android devices, allowing users to stay connected and collaborate on the go, ensuring seamless communication regardless of location. Zoho Cliq also offers mobile apps with similar functionality, enabling users to access and manage their conversations and tasks conveniently from their smartphones or tablets.

Mattermost vs Zoho Cliq

Overview