StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams

Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mattermost
Mattermost
Stacks480
Followers582
Votes302
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144

Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?

Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams

Mattermost and Microsoft Teams are two popular collaboration and communication platforms. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Here, we will highlight the main differences between Mattermost and Microsoft Teams.

  1. Customizability: Mattermost offers greater customization options compared to Microsoft Teams. Users can tailor the interface, features, and integrations according to their specific needs. This flexibility allows teams to build a personalized collaboration environment that suits their workflow.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Microsoft Teams is closely integrated with the Office 365 suite, making it seamless for organizations already using Microsoft products. On the other hand, Mattermost is platform-agnostic and can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, allowing teams to integrate it with a wide range of existing tools and systems.

  3. Open Source: Mattermost is an open-source platform, which means users have access to the source code and can modify and extend it to match their requirements. This not only offers more transparency but also allows for a more active and vibrant community-driven development process.

  4. Privacy and Security: Mattermost emphasizes privacy and security, providing end-to-end encryption and self-hosting options. This allows organizations with more stringent security and compliance requirements to have complete control over their data and communications. Microsoft Teams, although secure, operates within the Microsoft ecosystem and the data is stored on Microsoft servers, making it subject to their privacy and security policies.

  5. Pricing: Mattermost offers a flexible pricing structure, with a free open-source edition and various paid plans for additional features and support. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is bundled in the Office 365 suite and requires a subscription to access all its features. This makes Mattermost more cost-effective for small to medium-sized organizations.

  6. Integration Options: Mattermost provides extensive integration options with popular third-party tools and services. It has a vast library of integrations, allowing teams to connect their collaboration tool with their existing systems seamlessly. While Microsoft Teams also supports integrations, the options are more focused on the Microsoft ecosystem, limiting the flexibility for businesses using a diverse range of tools.

In summary, Mattermost offers greater customization, platform compatibility, privacy, and security options, while Microsoft Teams provides tight integration with the Microsoft suite, a wider range of collaboration features, and a more structured pricing model. The choice between the two would depend on the specific needs, existing infrastructure, and preferences of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Mattermost, Microsoft Teams

carlche0616
carlche0616

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.

197k views197k
Comments
Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k
Comments
Hirotaka
Hirotaka

Undergrad at DCSIL

Oct 7, 2020

Decided

Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.

  • Slack

We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.

  • Microsoft Teams

We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.

192k views192k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mattermost
Mattermost
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

All your team communication in one place, searchable and accessible anywhere; Slack-compatible, not Slack-limited. Imports Slack channels, users and themes. Offers Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations including Hubot, Jenkins, GitLab and others; Self-host ready with System Console and IT admin tools for managing dozens of team sites. Installs with Linux binary, plus Docker, Heroku, AWS, Azure and Cloud Foundry options
All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
Stacks
480
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
582
Followers
1.7K
Votes
302
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Open source
  • 41
    On-premise deployment
  • 26
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 21
    Fast and easy to use
Cons
  • 2
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 2
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 2
    Less integrations and plugins than slack
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Segment
Segment
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitLab
GitLab
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Hubot
Hubot
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Amazon SES
Amazon SES
Skype
Skype

What are some alternatives to Mattermost, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack