Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
LogRocket vs UserTesting: What are the differences?
Developers describe LogRocket as "Record everything users do on your site, so you can reproduce bugs and fix issues faster". LogRocket helps product teams build better experiences for their users. By recording videos of user sessions along with logs and network data, LogRocket surfaces UX problems and reveals the root cause of every bug. On the other hand, UserTesting is detailed as "Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use your website or mobile app". UserTesting provides on-demand usability testing. You create the test and we’ll get the testers. We let you “look over the shoulder” of your target audience while they use your website, so you can see and hear where users get stuck and why they leave.
LogRocket and UserTesting can be primarily classified as "User Feedback as a Service" tools.
Teleport, Drawbotics, and SupplyAI are some of the popular companies that use LogRocket, whereas UserTesting is used by Twitter, ebay, and Yelp. LogRocket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 68 company stacks & 11 developers stacks; compared to UserTesting, which is listed in 16 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.
Pros of LogRocket
- See a video of user using your website21
- See full user sessions20
- Detect user frustration18
- Console, network, and error logging18
- See why users ask for support18
- Intercom Integration14
- GitHub Integration12
- Fantastic Customer Support12
- Easy setup2
- Developer oriented1
- Redux Integration1
- Redux Integration0
Pros of UserTesting
- On-demand2
- Detailed metrics1