LogicMonitor vs Thundra: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code will outline the key differences between LogicMonitor and Thundra for a better understanding.

1. **Monitoring Focus**: LogicMonitor primarily focuses on infrastructure and network monitoring with various built-in integrations, while Thundra is tailored specifically for monitoring serverless architectures and provides deep insights into Lambda functions and microservices.
2. **Alerting Capabilities**: LogicMonitor offers customizable alerting rules and thresholds for proactive monitoring, while Thundra provides intelligent anomaly detection and insights to help identify issues before they impact performance.
3. **Performance Monitoring**: Thundra offers detailed performance metrics and distributed tracing for serverless environments, while LogicMonitor provides comprehensive performance monitoring for traditional infrastructure and cloud services.
4. **Integration Ecosystem**: LogicMonitor has a wide range of integrations for popular cloud platforms and applications, while Thundra focuses on seamless integration with AWS services and tools commonly used in serverless environments.
5. **Cost Structure**: LogicMonitor typically follows a subscription-based pricing model with features bundled together, while Thundra offers a more flexible pay-as-you-go pricing based on specific monitoring needs.
6. **Analysis and Visualization**: Thundra provides sophisticated analysis and visualization tools specifically designed for serverless architectures, whereas LogicMonitor offers comprehensive dashboards and reporting features for traditional monitoring environments.

In Summary, the key differences between LogicMonitor and Thundra lie in their monitoring focus, alerting capabilities, performance monitoring, integration ecosystem, cost structure, and analysis/visualization tools. Each platform caters to different monitoring needs and environments, providing unique strengths in their respective areas of expertise.