StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. LogicMonitor vs Skylight

LogicMonitor vs Skylight

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Stacks37
Followers90
Votes20
Skylight
Skylight
Stacks105
Followers69
Votes51

LogicMonitor vs Skylight: What are the differences?

Introduction: When choosing between monitoring tools like LogicMonitor and Skylight, it's important to understand the key differences to make an informed decision.

  1. Deployment Options: LogicMonitor offers both on-premises and cloud-based solutions, providing flexibility to accommodate various infrastructure setups. In comparison, Skylight is a cloud-native monitoring tool, meaning it operates solely in the cloud without the option for on-premises deployment. This difference can be crucial depending on your organization's specific requirements and preferences.

  2. Supported Platforms: LogicMonitor supports a wide range of platforms, including cloud services like AWS, Azure, and GCP, as well as on-premises servers, networking equipment, and applications. On the other hand, Skylight focuses primarily on cloud-based environments, offering deep visibility and monitoring capabilities specifically tailored to cloud services. Understanding the platforms your organization uses is essential when selecting a monitoring tool that aligns with your ecosystem.

  3. Customization and Scalability: LogicMonitor provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor their monitoring setup to meet unique needs. It also offers scalability features to grow alongside your infrastructure. Skylight, while offering robust monitoring capabilities, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to LogicMonitor. Assessing the level of customization and scalability required for your monitoring solution is key in choosing between the two.

  4. Alerting and Notifications: LogicMonitor offers advanced alerting and notification functionalities, allowing users to set up alerts based on specific thresholds and conditions. Skylight also provides alerting features, but the depth and customization options may differ from LogicMonitor. Understanding your organization's alerting requirements, such as the types of alerts needed and the preferred notification channels, can help determine which tool best suits your needs.

  5. Cost Structure: LogicMonitor's pricing is typically based on the number of monitored devices or services, with different tiers offering varying features and capabilities. Skylight's pricing structure may differ, potentially based on factors like data usage or specific features required. Comparing the cost structures of both tools in relation to your organization's budget and monitoring needs is essential in making a cost-effective decision.

  6. Integration Capabilities: Both LogicMonitor and Skylight offer integration capabilities with other tools and services, enhancing their overall functionality and usability. However, the ease of integration and the range of supported integrations may vary between the two. Evaluating your existing toolset and determining the importance of seamless integrations can help determine which monitoring tool is the best fit for your organization.

In Summary, Understanding the key differences in deployment options, supported platforms, customization, alerting, cost structures, and integration capabilities is essential in choosing between LogicMonitor and Skylight for your monitoring needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Skylight
Skylight

LogicMonitor provides the end-to-end visibility needed to maintain the performance and availability of business applications. It leverages automation and built-in intelligence to monitor today's complex and distributed infrastructures.

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Full Stack Performance Monitoring;Pre-configured monitoring, with built-in alert thresholds, for 1000+ technologies;Works with any Deployment Model: On-prem, Hybrid, & Hybrid Cloud;Granular Monitoring for AWS;Network Scan & Automated Device Discovery;Alert Routing & Escalation;Alert & Performance Forecasting;Custom Dashboards;Custom Reports;REST API;Syslog, Event, & Batch Job Monitoring;External Website Monitoring;Out-of-the-box Integrations for many Communication & Ticketing Tools;Data Stored for up to 2 years Without Aggregation;Remote Sessions;Configuration Management;Automatic Data Backup & Disaster Recovery;Unlimited Users & Granular RBAC;Ongoing Support & Training;SSO & 2FA
Skylight looks at how your code is behaving in production, alerting you to improvements you can make before they become showstoppers.;Skylight tells you exactly how your app is spending its time where it matters most—in your production environment;Pricing starts at $20 for the first million requests, with automatic discounts for high-volume customers;Skylight is built with badass hipster tech: Ruby on Rails, Ember.js, Rust, Storm, Dropwizard, Kafka, Cassandra, and more.
Statistics
Stacks
37
Stacks
105
Followers
90
Followers
69
Votes
20
Votes
51
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Fast deployment
  • 5
    Auto discovery
  • 3
    Awesome support
  • 3
    Very extensible
  • 3
    Agentless
Pros
  • 11
    Beautiful UI
  • 8
    Made by ember.js and rails core team members
  • 8
    Sort by 'agony' - lists low hanging fruit fixes
  • 7
    Actionable analytics with concrete numbers
  • 6
    Free tier
Cons
  • 1
    Comparing different timeframes is difficult
Integrations
RightScale
RightScale
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Twilio
Twilio
HipChat
HipChat
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to LogicMonitor, Skylight?

New Relic

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Librato

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

SignalFx

SignalFx

We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana