Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
LoadNinja vs Loader.io: What are the differences?
Cost: LoadNinja is a paid tool that requires a subscription, while Loader.io offers a free tier with limited features as well as paid plans for more advanced functionality. LoadNinja provides a more comprehensive set of features but at a cost, whereas Loader.io is ideal for smaller projects or those on a tight budget.
Scripting Capabilities: LoadNinja offers a codeless scripting approach, allowing users to create and edit test scripts without needing to code. On the other hand, Loader.io requires users to write custom scripts in popular programming languages such as Python or JavaScript. This difference makes LoadNinja more user-friendly for non-technical users, while Loader.io is preferred by those with coding experience.
Real Browser-Based Testing: LoadNinja specializes in real browser-based load testing, simulating user interactions accurately. In contrast, Loader.io focuses more on API testing and does not offer the same level of detailed browser simulation. If your testing requirements involve complex web applications with various user interactions, LoadNinja may be a better fit.
Integrations: LoadNinja provides seamless integration with popular tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Slack for efficient test execution and result reporting. Loader.io, on the other hand, offers integrations with services like PagerDuty and Zapier but may not have as extensive integration options as LoadNinja. Depending on your existing toolset, one of the platforms may be easier to integrate into your workflow.
Reporting and Analytics: LoadNinja boasts advanced reporting capabilities with detailed insights into performance metrics and actionable analytics. Loader.io provides basic performance metrics but may not offer the same level of in-depth analysis and customization options. If detailed performance reports are crucial for your testing process, LoadNinja may be the better choice.
User Interface: LoadNinja features a user-friendly and intuitive interface that simplifies the load testing process, making it easy for beginners to get started. Loader.io, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more technical approach and interface design. Depending on your team's expertise and the learning curve you are willing to tolerate, one platform may be more suitable than the other.
In Summary, LoadNinja offers comprehensive features and ease of use but comes at a cost, while Loader.io provides a free tier option with a focus on API testing and less detailed browser simulation capabilities.
I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?
My choice would be Apache JMeter, It's free and opensource plus it comes with lots of plugins and extendability. Apache JMeter needs a small amount of a learning curve and a basic understanding of Network, Protocols (TCP/IP ports, HTTP(S) and REST/SOAP, etc.) for initial setup. But it doesn't require programming skills. it has a nice record and playback option. You can still carry on without the developer skillset if you follow these steps. 1. Take backup. 2. Start recording and interact with the application. 3. stop recording and save the test case. This will give you your test-bed, after this, after these steps, every time just do Restore from backup and then Playback and observer results.
If you have longer recordings then an understanding of how to modify the recorded scripts will come handy.
For some of the advanced features such as Configuring variables, implementing loops, throttling adding think time, and automating test scaling to the number of users will require good planning of test scenarios and a Developer experience but this is true for any tool (even loader.io)
Disclaimer: I work at k6, and I recommend you try our tool.
It might require some coding skills, but we support a few options to record a user session to autogenerate the load test. Read How to record a browser session with k6 OSS.
The k6 Cloud also supports recording a user session with a Browser Extension. Additionally, it provides a Test Builder UI to generate a load test for testing APIs.
If you have questions or need help, you can ask on Slack and the Community forum.
Pros of Loader.io
- Easy to use9
- Free tier6
- Heroku add-on3
