Kurento vs Wowza

Overview

Wowza

Stacks43

Followers72

Votes0

Kurento

Stacks40

Followers141

Votes5

Kurento vs Wowza: What are the differences?

Introduction

Kurento and Wowza are both popular media streaming platforms that offer different features and functionalities. While both provide streaming capabilities, they have some key differences that set them apart from each other.

Scalability: Kurento is designed to be highly scalable, allowing it to handle a large number of concurrent streams and clients. It utilizes a modular architecture that enables easy scaling by adding more instances as needed. On the other hand, Wowza also supports scalability, but its scalability features are not as extensive as Kurento. Wowza mainly achieves scalability through load balancing and clustering.
Open Source vs Proprietary: Kurento is an open-source platform, which means that its source code is freely available for modification and distribution. This allows developers to customize and extend the platform according to their specific requirements. In contrast, Wowza is a proprietary platform that requires a license to use. It offers a commercial version with additional features and support.
Customizability: Kurento provides a higher level of customizability compared to Wowza. As an open-source platform, developers have the flexibility to modify and adapt Kurento's codebase to meet their unique needs. Additionally, Kurento offers a comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs, allowing developers to build custom applications with ease. Wowza, while customizable to a certain extent, has limitations due to its proprietary nature.
Multi-platform Support: Kurento supports a wide range of platforms and operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. It also provides client libraries for key programming languages like Java, JavaScript, and Python. On the other hand, Wowza primarily supports Linux-based systems but also offers limited support for Windows and macOS.
Pricing: Kurento is a free and open-source platform, making it cost-effective for businesses and developers. While support and maintenance might require additional resources, the core platform itself is free to use. Wowza, on the other hand, requires purchasing a license for its commercial version, which can be a significant cost factor for organizations.
Ease of Use: Kurento provides a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it relatively easy to get started with. It offers a range of pre-built applications and templates that simplify the development process. Wowza, while feature-rich, can be somewhat complex for beginners. Its interface may require a learning curve, and the documentation may not be as extensive as that of Kurento.

In Summary, Kurento and Wowza differ in terms of scalability, open-source nature, customizability, platform support, pricing, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Wowza, Kurento

Kerry

Apr 23, 2020

Needs adviceon

Amazon S3

Docker

Wowza

We would like to connect a number of (about 25) video streams, from an Amazon S3 bucket containing video data to endpoints accessible to a Docker image, which, when run, will process the input video streams and emit some JSON statistics.

The 25 video streams should be synchronized. Could people share their experiences with a similar scenario and perhaps offer advice about which is better (Wowza, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams) for this kind of problem, or why they chose one technology over the other?

The video stream duration will be quite long (about 8 hours each x 25 camera sources). The 25 video streams will have no audio component. If you worked with a similar problem, what was your experience with scaling, latency, resource requirements, config, etc.?

88.9k views88.9k

Comments

Anonymous

Jul 29, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bitmovin

Wowza

We want to make a live streaming platform demo to show off our video compression technology.

Simply put, we will stream content from 12 x 4K cameras ——> to an edge server(s) containing our compression software ——> either to Bitmovin or Wowza ——> to a media player.

What we would like to know is, is one of the above streaming engines more suited to multiple feeds (we will eventually be using more than 100 4K cameras for the actual streaming platform), 4K content streaming, latency, and functions such as being to Zoom in on the 4K content?

If anyone has any insight into the above, we would be grateful for your advice. We are a Japanese company and were recommended the above two streaming engines but know nothing about them as they literally “foreign” to us.

Thanks so much.

86.6k views86.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Wowza	Kurento
It offers a customizable live streaming platform to build, deploy and manage high-quality video, live and on-demand. It powers professional-grade streaming for any use case and any device.	It is a WebRTC media server and a set of client APIs making simple the development of advanced video applications for WWW and smartphone platforms. Media Server features include group communications, transcoding and more.
Cloud Streaming Services; Streaming Server Software	WebRTC media server ; group communications; broadcasting and routing of audiovisual flows
Statistics
Stacks 43	Stacks 40
Followers 72	Followers 141
Votes 0	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 MCU
Integrations
PHP WordPress	JavaScript Node.js OpenCV

What are some alternatives to Wowza, Kurento?

Zencoder

Zencoder downloads the video and converts it to as many formats as you need. Every output is encoded concurrently, with virtually no waiting—whether you do one or one hundred. Zencoder then uploads the resulting videos to a server, CDN, an S3 bucket, or wherever you dictate in your API call.

GStreamer

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

Cloudflare Stream

Cloudflare Stream makes integrating high-quality streaming video into a web or mobile application easy. Using a single, integrated workflow through a robust API or drag and drop UI, application owners can focus on creating the best video experience.

Bacon AI

Create studio-quality images, videos, and UGC - in minutes

Free AI Video Generator

Unleash your creativity with letsmkvideo, the leading AI video generator. Effortlessly create professional videos from text, animate photos, and create stunning AI video effects. Get started for free—no watermarks, just high-quality results in minutes.

Shared with VideoCompress

Fast, free, and easy-to-use video compressor with no watermark and no usage limits.Reduce file size without losing quality for MP4, MOV, AVI, and more.

Vmake

Is a video editor designed for talking head videos, making it easier to generate creative video editing ideas.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Convert or transcode media files from their source format into versions that will playback on devices like smartphones, tablets and PCs. Create a transcoding “job” specifying the location of your source media file and how you want it transcoded. Amazon Elastic Transcoder also provides transcoding presets for popular output formats. All these features are available via service API, AWS SDKs and the AWS Management Console.

OBS Studio

It is a free and open source software for video recording and live streaming. It is equipped with a powerful API, enabling plugins and scripts to provide further customization and functionality specific to your needs. It supports all your favorite streaming platforms and more.

AWS Elemental MediaConvert

AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a file-based video transcoding service with broadcast-grade features. It allows you to easily create video-on-demand (VOD) content for broadcast and multiscreen delivery at scale.

Related Comparisons

Kurento vs Wowza: What are the differences?

Introduction

Scalability: Kurento is designed to be highly scalable, allowing it to handle a large number of concurrent streams and clients. It utilizes a modular architecture that enables easy scaling by adding more instances as needed. On the other hand, Wowza also supports scalability, but its scalability features are not as extensive as Kurento. Wowza mainly achieves scalability through load balancing and clustering.
Open Source vs Proprietary: Kurento is an open-source platform, which means that its source code is freely available for modification and distribution. This allows developers to customize and extend the platform according to their specific requirements. In contrast, Wowza is a proprietary platform that requires a license to use. It offers a commercial version with additional features and support.
Customizability: Kurento provides a higher level of customizability compared to Wowza. As an open-source platform, developers have the flexibility to modify and adapt Kurento's codebase to meet their unique needs. Additionally, Kurento offers a comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs, allowing developers to build custom applications with ease. Wowza, while customizable to a certain extent, has limitations due to its proprietary nature.
Multi-platform Support: Kurento supports a wide range of platforms and operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. It also provides client libraries for key programming languages like Java, JavaScript, and Python. On the other hand, Wowza primarily supports Linux-based systems but also offers limited support for Windows and macOS.
Pricing: Kurento is a free and open-source platform, making it cost-effective for businesses and developers. While support and maintenance might require additional resources, the core platform itself is free to use. Wowza, on the other hand, requires purchasing a license for its commercial version, which can be a significant cost factor for organizations.
Ease of Use: Kurento provides a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it relatively easy to get started with. It offers a range of pre-built applications and templates that simplify the development process. Wowza, while feature-rich, can be somewhat complex for beginners. Its interface may require a learning curve, and the documentation may not be as extensive as that of Kurento.

In Summary, Kurento and Wowza differ in terms of scalability, open-source nature, customizability, platform support, pricing, and ease of use.

Kurento vs Wowza

Overview