Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Karate DSL vs TestNG: What are the differences?
Karate DSL: Karate DSL is an open-source tool that is designed to enable the creation of automated tests for web services and APIs. It is mainly used for integration testing and supports both REST and SOAP protocols. Karate DSL uses a domain-specific language (DSL) to write test scripts, making it easier to understand and maintain.
TestNG: TestNG is a testing framework for the Java programming language. It is mainly used for unit testing, integration testing, and functional testing. TestNG provides a wide range of features such as test prioritization, parameterization, data-driven testing, and test configuration through XML files.
Syntax and Language: Karate DSL uses its own simple and intuitive syntax that is specifically designed for writing API tests. It allows users to combine HTTP request and response assertions, data-driven testing, and various test scenarios within a single test script. On the other hand, TestNG uses Java as its programming language, requiring users to have a good understanding of Java syntax and concepts.
Built-in Reporting: Karate DSL comes with built-in HTML reports that provide detailed insights into the test execution results. These reports include overall test statistics, scenario-wise results, and request/response logs. In contrast, TestNG requires the integration of third-party reporting tools, such as ExtentReports or Allure, for generating detailed test reports.
Parallel Execution: Karate DSL has in-built support for parallel execution of tests, allowing users to run multiple tests concurrently. This feature is especially useful for reducing the overall test execution time and improving test efficiency. On the other hand, TestNG also supports parallel execution but requires explicit configuration to enable it.
Integration with Other Tools: Karate DSL seamlessly integrates with popular tools such as Cucumber, Gatling, and Maven. This makes it easier to incorporate Karate DSL into existing testing frameworks and perform activities like load testing and continuous integration. TestNG, on the other hand, has its own ecosystem of extensions and integrations, making it more versatile in terms of tool compatibility.
In Summary, Karate DSL and TestNG are both powerful testing frameworks, but Karate DSL specifically focuses on API testing with its own DSL syntax and built-in reporting. TestNG, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose testing framework for Java with a wider range of features and flexibility in tool integration.
Pros of Karate DSL
- Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI11
- Easy for even non-programmers to get started9
- Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses9
- Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources7
- Easy parameterized configuration / custom variables5
- Very fast api testing tool5
- Comprehensive documentation and examples5
- Powerful and flexible payload assertions4
- Simple, concise, readable and maintainable tests4
- Easy re-use of JSON or JS / Java logic across tests4
- IDE support - IntelliJ, Eclipse & Visual Studio Code4
- Best option for testing GraphQL3
- Java-interop so you never "hit a wall" in the framework3
- Simple yet flexible Environment Switching built-in2
- Optionally mix re-usable JavaScript logic into scripts1
- Parallel Execution with Reports Aggregated1
- Active, Responsive community on Stack Overflow1
- Re-use functional tests as performance tests1
- Super simple API mocking, within the firewall1
- XML support, not just JSON1
- Developer-friendly collaboration via standard SCM / Git1
- Rich HTML reports with HTTP logs in-line1
- Great Developer-Experience - Debug UI, HTML reports1
- Websockets support1
- Rest assured0
Pros of TestNG
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Karate DSL
- Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b1
- Finding errors in code is not easy1
- There is no IntelliSense support in IDE1
- Karate uses its own scripting language1
- Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern1
- Confusing report: Summarized by steps and not by featur1