Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1
Apache Maven

+ 1
Add tool

Apache Maven vs jFrog: What are the differences?


Apache Maven and jFrog are two popular software development tools used in the Java ecosystem. While both tools are designed to streamline the build, test, and deployment processes, there are several key differences between them. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences in detail.

  1. Dependency Management: One of the key differences between Apache Maven and jFrog is their approach to dependency management. Maven utilizes a centralized repository known as the Maven Central Repository, which houses a vast collection of Java libraries and dependencies. It automatically resolves and downloads dependencies based on the project's configuration. On the other hand, jFrog allows for more flexibility by supporting multiple repositories, including public, private, and remote repositories. This allows developers to have more control over their dependencies and can be especially beneficial in enterprise-level projects.

  2. Build Lifecycle: Another important difference lies in their approach to the build lifecycle. Maven follows a predetermined build lifecycle that consists of phases such as compile, test, package, and deploy. Each phase is bound to a set of default plugins, which can be customized as per the project's requirements. In contrast, jFrog provides a more flexible and customizable build pipeline that allows developers to define their own stages and actions. This enables better integration with existing systems and workflows, especially in complex development scenarios.

  3. Integration with CI/CD tools: Integration with CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) tools is crucial in modern software development. Maven is well-established and has extensive integration with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo. It provides plugins and extensions to facilitate seamless integration with these tools, allowing for easy automation of build and deployment processes. jFrog, on the other hand, offers its own CI/CD solution called JFrog Pipelines. It provides native integration with other JFrog products like JFrog Artifactory and JFrog Xray, enabling end-to-end automation of the entire software development lifecycle.

  4. Artifact Management: When it comes to artifact management, both Maven and jFrog excel in their respective approaches. Maven delivers artifacts in the form of JARs, WARs, or other archive formats, which can be published to repositories for consumption by other projects or developers. It provides comprehensive versioning and release management features, making it easier to track and distribute artifacts. jFrog takes artifact management to the next level by providing advanced features like metadata manipulation, distribution management, and access control. It also offers powerful search capabilities, allowing developers to quickly locate and retrieve artifacts when needed.

  5. Community Support: Maven, being an open-source project with a long history, has a large and active community of developers contributing to its growth and maintenance. This results in a rich ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and community support forums, making it easier for developers to find solutions and seek help when facing challenges. jFrog, being a commercial product, also has a supportive community but with a more focused and dedicated support structure. It provides enterprise-grade support, training, and consulting services, which can be beneficial for organizations requiring high-level assistance.

  6. Offline Mode: Apache Maven offers an "Offline Mode" which allows developers to build projects without accessing external repositories. This is particularly useful in scenarios where internet connectivity is limited or unreliable. jFrog, on the other hand, does not have an explicit offline mode feature. However, it provides caching and proxy capabilities through JFrog Artifactory, which can store and serve artifacts locally. This can help mitigate dependency resolution and build issues caused by internet connectivity problems.

In summary, Apache Maven and jFrog are both powerful tools for software development, but they differ in various aspects such as dependency management, build lifecycle, integration with CI/CD tools, artifact management, community support, and offline mode capability. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project or organization.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of jFrog
Pros of Apache Maven
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 138
      Dependency management
    • 70
      Necessary evil
    • 60
      I’d rather code my app, not my build
    • 48
      Publishing packaged artifacts
    • 43
      Convention over configuration
    • 18
    • 11
      Consistency across builds
    • 6
      Prevents overengineering using scripting
    • 4
      Runs Tests
    • 4
      Lot of cool plugins
    • 3
    • 2
      Hard to customize
    • 2
      Runs on Linux
    • 1
      Runs on OS X
    • 1
      Slow incremental build
    • 1
      Inconsistent buillds
    • 1
    • 1
      Good IDE tooling

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of jFrog
    Cons of Apache Maven
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 6
      • 1
        Inconsistent buillds
      • 0
        Not many plugin-alternatives

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is jFrog?

      Host, manage and proxy artifacts using the best Docker Registry, Maven Repository, Gradle repository, NuGet repository, Ruby repository, Debian repository npm repository, Yum repository.

      What is Apache Maven?

      Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use jFrog?
      What companies use Apache Maven?
      See which teams inside your own company are using jFrog or Apache Maven.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with jFrog?
      What tools integrate with Apache Maven?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to jFrog and Apache Maven?
      JFrog Artifactory
      It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
      In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
      GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
      GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
      Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
      See all alternatives