StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Jetty vs Socket.IO

Jetty vs Socket.IO

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
Socket.IO
Socket.IO
Stacks13.6K
Followers11.0K
Votes776

Jetty vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jetty and Socket.IO are two widely used technologies in web development. While Jetty is a web server and servlet container that is specifically designed for Java applications, Socket.IO is a JavaScript library that enables real-time, bidirectional communication between clients and servers. Despite being used for similar purposes, there are some key differences between Jetty and Socket.IO that set them apart.

  1. Integration with Different Languages: The primary difference between Jetty and Socket.IO lies in their integration with different programming languages. Jetty is primarily used in Java-based applications, providing an efficient and reliable web server and servlet container. On the other hand, Socket.IO is compatible with multiple languages, including JavaScript, Python, and Java, allowing developers to implement real-time communication in applications developed in these languages.

  2. Protocol Support: Another significant difference between Jetty and Socket.IO is the protocol support. Jetty primarily supports HTTP and Servlet protocols, making it suitable for building web applications that follow traditional request-response patterns. In contrast, Socket.IO is designed specifically for real-time communication and supports a variety of protocols, including WebSockets, polling, and HTTP long-polling. This versatility enables Socket.IO to provide real-time features like event-driven communication and instant updates.

  3. Transport Methods: Jetty supports traditional transport methods like HTTP and TCP/IP. It relies on these well-established protocols to handle client-server communication. Socket.IO, on the other hand, offers a wider range of transport methods, including WebSocket, Ajax long-polling, and JSONP polling. This allows Socket.IO to adapt to different network conditions and fallback to alternative methods if the primary transport is not supported or available.

  4. Infrastructure Requirements: Jetty requires a Java runtime environment to run the Java-based web applications it hosts. The infrastructure necessary for Jetty includes the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), which may require additional resources compared to more lightweight alternatives. Socket.IO, being a JavaScript library, runs directly in the browser and does not have any specific infrastructure requirements beyond the standard web browser environment.

  5. Event Handling: Jetty primarily follows the traditional request-response model and event handling is built around servlets and filters. In Jetty, developers need to handle events like HTTP requests and associated actions explicitly. Socket.IO, on the other hand, simplifies event handling by providing an event-driven architecture, where events can be emitted and listened to on both the client and server sides. This makes it easier to implement real-time communication and handle events in a more intuitive manner.

  6. Development Community and Ecosystem: Jetty and Socket.IO have different developer communities and ecosystems. Jetty has been around for a longer time and has a mature Java ecosystem with a vast number of libraries and frameworks that integrate well with it. Socket.IO, being primarily JavaScript-based, benefits from the wide JavaScript developer community and ecosystem, with numerous libraries and frameworks to support real-time communication and web development.

In summary, Jetty is a Java-based web server and servlet container primarily used for web applications, while Socket.IO is a JavaScript library that provides real-time bidirectional communication capabilities across different programming languages. The key differences between Jetty and Socket.IO lie in their integration with different languages, protocol support, transport methods, infrastructure requirements, event handling, and development communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jetty, Socket.IO

Noam
Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJSReactReact

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M
Comments
Anil
Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
Socket.IO
Socket.IO

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Real-time analytics - Push data to clients that gets represented as real-time counters, charts or logs.;Binary streaming - Starting in 1.0, it's possible to send any blob back and forth: image, audio, video.;Instant messaging and chat - Socket.IO's "Hello world" is a chat app in just a few lines of code.;Document collaboration - Allow users to concurrently edit a document and see each other's changes.
Statistics
Stacks
510
Stacks
13.6K
Followers
311
Followers
11.0K
Votes
47
Votes
776
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 6
    Very thin
  • 6
    Scalable
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 12
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 3
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Websocket Errors
  • 2
    Small community
Integrations
No integrations available
Auth0
Auth0
Gatsby
Gatsby
Flutter
Flutter
React
React
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
Outbrain
Outbrain

What are some alternatives to Jetty, Socket.IO?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase