StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. HashiCorp Waypoint vs Spinnaker

HashiCorp Waypoint vs Spinnaker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Stacks233
Followers358
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.2K
HashiCorp Waypoint
HashiCorp Waypoint
Stacks18
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks331

HashiCorp Waypoint vs Spinnaker: What are the differences?

**Key differences between HashiCorp Waypoint and Spinnaker:**
  1. Architecture and Focus: HashiCorp Waypoint is a cloud-agnostic build and deployment tool that focuses on simplicity and developer-centric workflows. It provides a unified interface for building, deploying, and releasing applications across different infrastructures. On the other hand, Spinnaker is a multi-cloud continuous delivery platform that focuses on orchestrating complex deployments and provides advanced features like canary deployments, automated rollbacks, and multi-region deployment strategies.
  2. Integration with CI/CD: Waypoint integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD platforms like CircleCI, Jenkins, and GitHub Actions, allowing developers to automate the build and deployment process as part of their existing workflows. In contrast, Spinnaker is a standalone platform that can be used alongside CI/CD tools but requires additional configuration to integrate with them.
  3. Deployment Strategies: Waypoint supports a wide range of deployment strategies, including rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary releases. It allows developers to define deployment policies using a simple configuration file. Spinnaker, on the other hand, provides a more extensive set of deployment strategies, including red/black deployments, traffic shaping, and customizable deployment pipelines.
  4. Cloud Provider Support: Waypoint is designed to work with any cloud provider and can be easily extended to support new providers through plugins. It abstracts away the underlying infrastructure, allowing developers to focus on building and deploying applications. Spinnaker, on the other hand, has built-in support for major cloud providers like Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure. It provides native integration with provider-specific features and services.
  5. Community and Ecosystem: Waypoint is a relatively new project from HashiCorp and is rapidly gaining popularity. It has an active community and an expanding ecosystem of plugins and integrations. Spinnaker, on the other hand, has been around for several years and has a mature community and a wide-ranging ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations.
  6. Use Cases and Scale: Waypoint is best suited for small to medium-sized applications and organizations that value simplicity and ease of use. It works well for developers who want to streamline their workflows and simplify their deployment process across different infrastructure environments. Spinnaker, on the other hand, is designed for large-scale, enterprise-level deployments with complex requirements and multi-cloud environments. It provides advanced features for managing deployments at scale and supports high availability and fault tolerance.

In Summary, HashiCorp Waypoint focuses on simplicity, supports various deployment strategies, integrates with popular CI/CD tools, and works with any cloud provider, while Spinnaker specializes in orchestrating complex deployments, provides advanced deployment strategies and scalability features, and has a mature community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
HashiCorp Waypoint
HashiCorp Waypoint

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

It provides a modern workflow to build, deploy, and release across platforms. It uses a single configuration file and common workflow to manage and observe deployments across platforms such as Kubernetes, Nomad, EC2, Google Cloud Run, and more.

-
View log output for running applications and deployments; Execute a command in the context of a running application; Get publicly accessible preview URLs per-deployment; View projects and applications being deployed by Waypoint in a web interface; Integrate with existing CI/CD providers and version control providers like GitHub, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab, and more; Easily extend Waypoint with custom support for platforms, build processes, and release systems
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
331
Stacks
233
Stacks
18
Followers
358
Followers
31
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Mature
Cons
  • 3
    No GitOps
  • 1
    Configuration time
  • 1
    Management overhead
  • 1
    Ease of use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Packer
Packer
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Jenkins
Jenkins
Docker
Docker
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
GitLab
GitLab
Docker
Docker
GitHub
GitHub
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Nomad
Nomad
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Spinnaker, HashiCorp Waypoint?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

Kraken Deploy

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

DeployHQ

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana