StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. Hangfire vs MassTransit

Hangfire vs MassTransit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hangfire
Hangfire
Stacks333
Followers249
Votes17
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks1.7K
MassTransit
MassTransit
Stacks167
Followers176
Votes0

Hangfire vs MassTransit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Hangfire and MassTransit are two popular frameworks used in web development for different purposes. Hangfire is primarily used for background job processing, while MassTransit is used for message-based communication between applications. While both frameworks have similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration: Hangfire integrates seamlessly with various .NET frameworks and libraries, making it a versatile choice for background job processing. On the other hand, MassTransit is designed for distributed systems and provides comprehensive support for message-based communication using various messaging transports such as RabbitMQ and Azure Service Bus.
  2. Focus: Hangfire is primarily focused on scheduling and executing background jobs, providing features like recurring tasks, delayed jobs, and job filters. In contrast, MassTransit focuses on facilitating message-based communication patterns such as request/response, publish/subscribe, and routing.
  3. Job Persistence: Hangfire stores job information in a persistent storage like SQL Server, Redis, or PostgreSQL, ensuring job state persistence and durability. In contrast, MassTransit keeps track of messages using message brokers like RabbitMQ or Azure Service Bus, offering guaranteed message delivery and fault tolerance.
  4. Scaling: Hangfire allows scaling by adding and distributing workload across multiple servers or worker instances, increasing overall performance and processing capacity. With MassTransit, scaling can be achieved by distributing messages across multiple instances or even running separate service instances to handle specific message types or tasks.
  5. Error Handling: Hangfire provides various options for handling failed jobs, including retry mechanisms, configuration-based error handling, and integrations with external logging systems. MassTransit also offers error-handling mechanisms like retries, error queues, and dead-letter queues, but its focus is more on message-based fault tolerance and error handling.
  6. Development Experience: Hangfire provides a simple API for adding background job processing to applications, making it easy for developers to get started quickly. MassTransit, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its focus on message-based communication patterns and requires familiarization with messaging concepts and architectures.

In summary, Hangfire and MassTransit serve different purposes in web development. Hangfire focuses on background job processing and provides scalability, while MassTransit focuses on message-based communication and offers fault tolerance. Both frameworks have their own strengths and considerations that developers need to take into account when choosing the right tool for their specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hangfire
Hangfire
MassTransit
MassTransit

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

It is free software/open-source .NET-based Enterprise Service Bus software that helps Microsoft developers route messages over MSMQ, RabbitMQ, TIBCO and ActiveMQ service busses, with native support for MSMQ and RabbitMQ.

-
Message-based communication; Reliable; Scalable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
333
Stacks
167
Followers
249
Followers
176
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Integrated UI dashboard
  • 5
    Simple
  • 3
    Robust
  • 2
    In Memory
  • 0
    Simole
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET
Server Density
Server Density
PHP
PHP
Datadog
Datadog
Tutum
Tutum

What are some alternatives to Hangfire, MassTransit?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase