StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs TortoiseGit

GitHub vs TortoiseGit

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
TortoiseGit
TortoiseGit
Stacks50
Followers90
Votes5

GitHub vs TortoiseGit: What are the differences?

GitHub and TortoiseGit are both popular tools used for version control and collaboration on software development projects. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Hosting Platform: The most significant difference between GitHub and TortoiseGit is that GitHub is a cloud-based hosting platform for code repositories, while TortoiseGit is a client-based interface for the Git version control system. This means that GitHub allows users to host their code online and collaborate with others, while TortoiseGit focuses more on providing a user-friendly interface for working with Git locally on a developer's machine.

  2. User Interface: GitHub provides a web-based user interface, making it accessible from any device with an internet connection. On the other hand, TortoiseGit integrates directly into Windows Explorer, allowing developers to interact with their Git repositories using familiar file-explorer interactions. This makes TortoiseGit more suitable for developers who prefer working within the Windows environment and want a seamless integration with their existing workflows.

  3. Collaboration Features: GitHub offers powerful collaboration features, such as pull requests, issue tracking, and project management tools. These features make it easier for teams to work together, review code changes, and manage tasks. In contrast, TortoiseGit focuses primarily on the version control aspects of Git and does not provide built-in collaboration features. Developers using TortoiseGit might need to rely on other tools or platforms for collaboration and project management.

  4. Access Control: GitHub allows users to set up access control mechanisms, such as permissions and branch protection rules, to ensure that only authorized individuals can make changes to a repository. It also provides options for managing teams and organizations with different levels of access. TortoiseGit, being a client-based interface, relies on the underlying Git system for access control, which typically requires users to have appropriate permissions set up on the Git server.

  5. Community and Integration: GitHub has a large and active community of developers, making it easy to discover and contribute to open-source projects. It also integrates well with various development tools, such as continuous integration and deployment platforms, code editors, and project management tools. While TortoiseGit does not have its own community platform, it can be used with any Git server or repository, allowing developers to benefit from the broader Git community and its integration ecosystem.

  6. Pricing and Cost: GitHub offers various pricing plans, including free options for open-source projects and small teams, as well as paid plans with additional features for larger organizations. TortoiseGit, being an open-source client for Git, is free to use. However, it's worth noting that the cost of using Git, including any associated server or hosting infrastructure, may be applicable depending on the chosen setup.

In summary, GitHub is a popular cloud-based platform that provides Git repository hosting, collaboration features, issue tracking, and project management tools, enabling teams to collaborate on code development and manage software projects efficiently. TortoiseGit, on the other hand, is a Git client for Windows that integrates with the Windows Shell, providing a graphical user interface (GUI) for interacting with Git repositories directly from the file explorer, making it a convenient option for Windows users who prefer a desktop-based Git client.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, TortoiseGit

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
TortoiseGit
TortoiseGit

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
ShellExtension
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
50
Followers
259.0K
Followers
90
Votes
10.4K
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 4
    Turns Explorer into a git client
  • 1
    Free
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Windows
Windows
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to GitHub, TortoiseGit?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana