StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs RhodeCode

GitHub vs RhodeCode

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
RhodeCode
RhodeCode
Stacks33
Followers42
Votes210

GitHub vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub and RhodeCode

GitHub and RhodeCode are both web-based platforms for version control and code collaboration, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Pricing Model and Licensing: GitHub is primarily known for its cloud-based service, which offers limited free options and paid plans for individuals and organizations. In contrast, RhodeCode provides both self-hosted and cloud-hosted options, with a focus on enterprise-grade security and support. RhodeCode offers flexible pricing options, including free community editions and paid enterprise licenses.

  2. Supported Version Control Systems: GitHub has native support for Git, which is the most widely used distributed version control system. It also supports Subversion (SVN) repositories and Mercurial repositories, although these are deprecated and will be removed in the future. RhodeCode, on the other hand, provides native support for Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, offering more flexibility for businesses that use different version control systems.

  3. Access Control and Permissions: GitHub provides granular access control and permission settings, allowing repository owners to define different levels of access for individual collaborators or teams. RhodeCode offers even more extensive access control capabilities, with support for complex permission settings, role-based access control (RBAC), and fine-grained authorization strategies, making it suitable for organizations with strict security requirements.

  4. Code Review and Collaboration: GitHub provides a straightforward and intuitive interface for code review and collaboration, with features like pull requests, code commenting, and inline code review tools. RhodeCode offers similar features for code review and collaboration, but it also includes additional capabilities such as built-in code review workflows, customizable review templates, and integration with external code review tools, making it more suitable for teams that require more structured code review processes.

  5. Integration Ecosystem: GitHub has a vast ecosystem of integrations and third-party tools, making it easy to integrate with various development tools, project management platforms, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) systems. RhodeCode also provides integrations and plugins, but its ecosystem is more focused on enterprise-grade tools and integrations with commercial software, making it a good choice for organizations with specific tooling requirements.

  6. Enterprise-Grade Features: While GitHub offers some enterprise-grade features, such as security and compliance tools, RhodeCode is specifically designed to meet the needs of enterprise customers. RhodeCode provides advanced features like LDAP/Active Directory integration, single sign-on (SSO), audit logs, advanced user management, and fine-grained access control policies. These features make RhodeCode a better choice for businesses that require strict security, governance, and compliance controls.

In summary, GitHub and RhodeCode are both powerful platforms for version control and code collaboration, but RhodeCode offers more flexible licensing options, broader support for version control systems, advanced access control and permission settings, additional code review capabilities, and a stronger focus on enterprise-grade features and security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, RhodeCode

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
RhodeCode
RhodeCode

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
unified repository management across Mercurial, Git & SVN;full­-text source code search;web-­based code editor;built­-in code review tools;permission management system with IP restrictions;code snippets system (gists);authentication with LDAP, ActiveDirectory, BitBucket, Google & GitHub; integrations with Jira, RedMine, Jenkins
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
33
Followers
259.0K
Followers
42
Votes
10.4K
Votes
210
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 22
    Self hosted
  • 20
    Great performance
  • 19
    Integrations with CI / issue trackers
  • 19
    Multiple version control systems
  • 18
    Full text search
Cons
  • 0
    No easy installation for Windows
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Redmine
Redmine
TeamCity
TeamCity
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to GitHub, RhodeCode?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana