StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Gitpod

GitHub vs Gitpod

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Gitpod
Gitpod
Stacks91
Followers126
Votes13

GitHub vs Gitpod: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitHub and Gitpod are both popular tools used in software development, but they differ in several key aspects. Understanding the differences between GitHub and Gitpod can help developers choose the right tool for their project requirements and workflow. Below are the key differences between GitHub and Gitpod.

  1. Hosting and Collaboration: GitHub is primarily a web-based hosting platform for open-source projects, allowing developers to store, manage, and collaborate on code repositories. It provides a centralized platform for version control, issue tracking, and project management. On the other hand, Gitpod is an online integrated development environment (IDE) that leverages the power of Git and allows developers to write, review, and ship code without the need for complex local development setups. Gitpod integrates seamlessly with GitHub, enabling developers to open and work on their repositories directly from the GitHub interface.

  2. Workspace Environment: In GitHub, developers typically work with their repositories locally using their preferred IDEs or text editors. Gitpod, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based workspace environment where developers can instantly start coding without any local setup. Gitpod automatically builds a complete development environment using Docker, ensuring that all the necessary tools, dependencies, and extensions are readily available. This allows developers to work from any machine with an internet connection, enabling more flexibility and faster onboarding.

  3. Configuration and Customization: GitHub allows developers to configure their repositories by adding files such as READMEs, licenses, and configuration files. It also provides a variety of features and integrations that can be customized to suit the needs of a project. Gitpod, on the other hand, focuses on providing a consistent development environment out of the box. While developers can customize certain aspects of their Gitpod workspace, such as configuring Git settings or installing specific tools, its main goal is to provide a standardized environment that works across all projects.

  4. Development Workflow: GitHub is primarily designed for managing the versioning and collaboration aspects of software development. Developers clone repositories locally, make changes, commit them, and then push those changes back to the GitHub repository. Gitpod, on the other hand, provides a more streamlined development workflow within the browser. Developers can simply open their repositories in Gitpod and start coding directly within the web IDE. Gitpod automatically saves and synchronizes changes, making it easier to switch between different machines or collaborate with teammates.

  5. Collaboration Features: GitHub offers extensive collaboration features, such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking. It allows developers to work together, review code changes, and manage project tasks within a centralized platform. Gitpod, while integrated with GitHub, focuses more on the individual development experience. It provides features like live collaboration, where multiple users can work simultaneously in the same workspace, making it easier for teams to pair program or troubleshoot code together.

  6. Pricing and Availability: GitHub offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and storage available for paid users. Gitpod also has free and paid plans, but it is more focused on providing a cloud-based development environment rather than hosting repositories. Gitpod can be used in conjunction with a code hosting platform like GitHub or GitLab. The pricing and availability of Gitpod depend on the chosen plan and the integrations required.

In Summary, GitHub is a web-based hosting platform for code repositories with extensive collaboration features, while Gitpod is a cloud-based IDE that provides a streamlined development environment accessible anywhere.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Gitpod

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Gitpod
Gitpod

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Gitpod is an open source developer platform automating the provisioning of ready-to-code dev environments. Designed for applications running in the cloud, Gitpod frees engineering teams from the friction of manually setting-up loc

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
VS Code Extensions; JetBrains Plugins; Prebuilt Workspaces; Supports All Programming Languages; Language Support; Linux Terminals; Code Reviews; Parallel Workspaces; Create Snapshots; Works on any Device; Share Running Workspaces
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
91
Followers
259.0K
Followers
126
Votes
10.4K
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 3
    Can be locally hosted
  • 2
    Declarative worksaces in VCS
  • 2
    Cloud IDE
  • 1
    JetBrains IDEs Supported
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
PyCharm
PyCharm
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
PhpStorm
PhpStorm
GitLab
GitLab
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
WebStorm
WebStorm
Vim
Vim
RubyMine
RubyMine
GoLand
GoLand

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Gitpod?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Built on the open Eclipse Che project, Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces provides developer workspaces, which include all the tools and the dependencies that are needed to code, build, test, run, and debug applications.

AWS Cloud9

AWS Cloud9

Cloud9 provides a development environment in the cloud. Cloud9 enables developers to get started with coding immediately with pre-setup environments called workspaces, collaborate with their peers with collaborative coding features, and build web apps with features like live preview and browser compatibility testing. It supports more than 40 languages, with class A support for PHP, Ruby, Python, JavaScript/Node.js, and Go.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Koding

Koding

Koding is a feature rich cloud-based development environment complete with free VMs, an attractive IDE & sudo level terminal access!

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Nitrous.IO

Nitrous.IO

Get setup lightning fast in the cloud & code from anywhere, on any machine.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana