StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Fuse vs WSO2

Fuse vs WSO2

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WSO2
WSO2
Stacks84
Followers164
Votes0
GitHub Stars932
Forks862
Fuse
Fuse
Stacks63
Followers59
Votes0

Fuse vs WSO2: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Fuse and WSO2, two popular integration platforms.

  1. Message Transformation and Routing: Fuse offers a wide range of transformation capabilities and routing options, allowing users to easily transform data between different formats and protocols. WSO2, on the other hand, provides advanced mediation capabilities through its lightweight Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) architecture, enabling seamless routing and mediation of messages.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Fuse is known for its lightweight and highly scalable architecture, making it suitable for handling large volumes of data and high workloads. WSO2, on the other hand, is built on the concept of distributed deployment, which ensures excellent scalability and performance even in complex integration scenarios.

  3. Connectors and Adapters: Fuse provides a rich set of connectors and adapters, enabling easy integration with various external systems and platforms. WSO2 also offers a wide range of connectors, adapters, and protocols, making it easy to connect and integrate with different systems and technologies.

  4. Developer Experience and Tooling: Fuse provides a user-friendly development environment with tools like Apache Camel and Apache Karaf, which provide a seamless development experience. WSO2 offers a comprehensive developer toolkit with features like WSO2 Developer Studio and ESB graphical editor, making it easy to design, develop, and test integration solutions.

  5. Support and Community: Fuse has a strong and active community that provides support, guidance, and frequent updates. Red Hat, the organization behind Fuse, also offers professional support for enterprise customers. WSO2 also has an active community, provides commercial support, and offers a wide range of documentation and resources.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Fuse follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay for support and access to additional features. WSO2, on the other hand, follows an open-source model and provides the majority of its features and capabilities for free. They also offer paid support and additional enterprise features.

In summary, Fuse and WSO2 differ in terms of message transformation and routing capabilities, scalability and performance, connectors and adapters, developer experience and tooling, support and community, as well as pricing and licensing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

WSO2
WSO2
Fuse
Fuse

It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.

It is a set of user experience development tools that unify design, prototyping and implementation of high quality, native apps for iOS and Android.

100% Open Source;Largest Platform Built on Single Code Base;Cloud Enabled;Premium Support
Compiles native apps;Special features for creating responsive and smooth UI and animation;Cross-platform for iOS and Android;Declarative-reactive XML-based language;Ultra-fast OpenGL-based rendering;Flexible vector-based graphics; Native macOS and Windows tool suite with real-time preview;Preview on iOS and Android devices simultaneously
Statistics
GitHub Stars
932
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
862
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
84
Stacks
63
Followers
164
Followers
59
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Segment
Segment
Zapier
Zapier
Postman
Postman
Zendesk
Zendesk
Leftronic
Leftronic
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to WSO2, Fuse?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Discord

Discord

Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover.

Skype

Skype

Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Zoom

Zoom

Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.

Google Meet

Google Meet

It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

Jitsi

Jitsi

Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope