StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Fisheye vs GitHub

Fisheye vs GitHub

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Fisheye
Fisheye
Stacks40
Followers41
Votes0

Fisheye vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Fisheye and GitHub are both popular tools used for code review and collaboration in software development. However, they have some key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: One of the main differences between Fisheye and GitHub is their integration with version control systems. Fisheye is primarily designed to work with Atlassian's Bitbucket and other version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. On the other hand, GitHub is a cloud-based platform that is based on Git, which means it has native support for Git repositories.

  2. Hosting Options: Fisheye is a self-hosted product, meaning it needs to be installed and maintained on the user's own servers. This allows for more customization and control over the environment but also requires additional setup and maintenance efforts. In contrast, GitHub is a cloud-based service provided by GitHub Inc. The hosting is taken care of by GitHub, which means users can focus more on their code and collaboration rather than infrastructure management.

  3. Code Review Workflow: Fisheye offers a flexible code review workflow that can be tailored to fit different team needs. It provides options for mandatory reviewers, flexible workflows, and custom integration with issue tracking systems. GitHub, on the other hand, has a more streamlined code review process with features like pull requests. It simplifies the process of reviewing and discussing changes in the code by providing a dedicated interface and tools specifically designed for code review.

  4. Social Coding Community: GitHub has established itself as a popular platform for open-source development and has a vibrant community of developers. It provides features like code collaboration, sharing, and discoverability, which encourage collaboration and knowledge sharing among developers. Fisheye, on the other hand, is more focused on providing code review and collaboration capabilities within a team or organization rather than fostering a social coding community.

  5. Third-Party Integrations: GitHub has a wide range of third-party integrations and extensions available through its marketplace. These integrations allow users to enhance their development workflow by connecting GitHub with other tools and services they may use. Fisheye also offers integrations with other Atlassian tools like Jira and Confluence but may have a more limited selection of third-party integrations compared to GitHub.

  6. Pricing Model: Fisheye's pricing is based on a perpetual license model, where users purchase a license upfront and can use the product indefinitely, with an option for ongoing support and updates. On the other hand, GitHub offers a range of pricing options, including free plans for open-source projects and small teams, as well as paid plans with more advanced features and capabilities.

In Summary, Fisheye and GitHub differ in their integration with version control systems, hosting options, code review workflow, social coding community, third-party integrations, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Fisheye

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Fisheye
Fisheye

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

FishEye provides a read-only window into your Subversion, Perforce, CVS, Git, and Mercurial repositories, all in one place. Keep a pulse on everything about your code: Visualize and report on activity, integrate source with JIRA issues, and search for commits, files, revisions, or people.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Track code activity in one place;Cross-version control support;Code search;Commit graph
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
40
Followers
259.0K
Followers
41
Votes
10.4K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Jira
Jira

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Fisheye?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana