Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Firebase

40.1K
34.4K
+ 1
2K
WebEngage

21
28
+ 1
1
Add tool

Firebase vs WebEngage: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Firebase and WebEngage

Firebase and WebEngage are two popular platforms that are commonly used in web development. While both offer similar features and functionalities, there are key differences between the two that developers should be aware of.

  1. Data Storage and Hosting: Firebase provides a comprehensive suite of tools for data storage and hosting. It offers real-time database, cloud storage, and hosting services that allow developers to easily store and retrieve data. On the other hand, WebEngage does not provide data storage or hosting services. It primarily focuses on customer engagement and interaction.

  2. Customer Engagement: WebEngage specializes in customer engagement and interaction, offering features such as personalized push notifications, in-app messaging, and targeted campaigns. It provides a wide range of tools and features that help businesses engage with their customers effectively. Firebase, on the other hand, does not have the same level of focus on customer engagement and primarily focuses on backend services.

  3. Analytics and Reporting: Firebase offers a powerful analytics and reporting system that provides insights into user behavior, demographics, and app performance. It allows developers to track user engagement, retention, and conversion rates. WebEngage also provides analytics and reporting features, but it primarily focuses on customer behavior and engagement analytics rather than app performance.

  4. Integration with Third-Party Platforms: Firebase provides seamless integration with various Google services, such as Google Analytics, Google Ads, and Google Cloud functions. It also offers integration with popular platforms like Unity and AdMob. WebEngage, on the other hand, offers integration with a wide range of third-party platforms, including CRM software, marketing automation tools, and email marketing platforms.

  5. Customization and Flexibility: Firebase offers a high level of customization and flexibility, allowing developers to build and customize their own backend infrastructure. It provides SDKs for various platforms and programming languages, making it easy to integrate Firebase with existing systems. WebEngage, on the other hand, is a more specialized platform with limited customization options.

  6. Price and Licensing: Firebase has a tiered pricing structure, offering a free plan with limited functionality and paid plans with additional features. The pricing is based on usage and can vary depending on the services used. WebEngage also has a tiered pricing structure, but it primarily focuses on enterprise customers and offers a tailored pricing model based on specific requirements.

In summary, while both Firebase and WebEngage offer valuable features for web development, Firebase primarily focuses on backend services, data storage, and hosting, while WebEngage specializes in customer engagement and interaction. The choice between the two platforms depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

Advice on Firebase and WebEngage
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 465.5K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Firebase
Pros of WebEngage
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Chat
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy
  • 1
    It's super useful for surveys, and push notifications

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Firebase
Cons of WebEngage
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Firebase?

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

    What is WebEngage?

    WebEngage is a customer engagement Saas. It enables gathering of relevant customer data through feedback and survey. It also enables notification of services and discounts to the market. WebEngage offers solution for personalized real time marketing, customer insights, instantaneous feedback and personalized marketing

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Firebase?
    What companies use WebEngage?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Firebase or WebEngage.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Firebase?
    What tools integrate with WebEngage?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitNode.jsFirebase+5
    7
    2357
    What are some alternatives to Firebase and WebEngage?
    Parse
    With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    Auth0
    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
    Realm
    The Realm Mobile Platform is a next-generation data layer for applications. Realm is reactive, concurrent, and lightweight, allowing you to work with live, native objects.
    See all alternatives