StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Firebase vs WebEngage

Firebase vs WebEngage

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebase
Firebase
Stacks42.5K
Followers36.0K
Votes2.0K
WebEngage
WebEngage
Stacks22
Followers28
Votes1

Firebase vs WebEngage: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Firebase and WebEngage

Firebase and WebEngage are two popular platforms that are commonly used in web development. While both offer similar features and functionalities, there are key differences between the two that developers should be aware of.

  1. Data Storage and Hosting: Firebase provides a comprehensive suite of tools for data storage and hosting. It offers real-time database, cloud storage, and hosting services that allow developers to easily store and retrieve data. On the other hand, WebEngage does not provide data storage or hosting services. It primarily focuses on customer engagement and interaction.

  2. Customer Engagement: WebEngage specializes in customer engagement and interaction, offering features such as personalized push notifications, in-app messaging, and targeted campaigns. It provides a wide range of tools and features that help businesses engage with their customers effectively. Firebase, on the other hand, does not have the same level of focus on customer engagement and primarily focuses on backend services.

  3. Analytics and Reporting: Firebase offers a powerful analytics and reporting system that provides insights into user behavior, demographics, and app performance. It allows developers to track user engagement, retention, and conversion rates. WebEngage also provides analytics and reporting features, but it primarily focuses on customer behavior and engagement analytics rather than app performance.

  4. Integration with Third-Party Platforms: Firebase provides seamless integration with various Google services, such as Google Analytics, Google Ads, and Google Cloud functions. It also offers integration with popular platforms like Unity and AdMob. WebEngage, on the other hand, offers integration with a wide range of third-party platforms, including CRM software, marketing automation tools, and email marketing platforms.

  5. Customization and Flexibility: Firebase offers a high level of customization and flexibility, allowing developers to build and customize their own backend infrastructure. It provides SDKs for various platforms and programming languages, making it easy to integrate Firebase with existing systems. WebEngage, on the other hand, is a more specialized platform with limited customization options.

  6. Price and Licensing: Firebase has a tiered pricing structure, offering a free plan with limited functionality and paid plans with additional features. The pricing is based on usage and can vary depending on the services used. WebEngage also has a tiered pricing structure, but it primarily focuses on enterprise customers and offers a tailored pricing model based on specific requirements.

In summary, while both Firebase and WebEngage offer valuable features for web development, Firebase primarily focuses on backend services, data storage, and hosting, while WebEngage specializes in customer engagement and interaction. The choice between the two platforms depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Firebase, WebEngage

Jared
Jared

Contractor at Insight Global

Aug 9, 2019

ReviewonFirebaseFirebase

I started using Firebase over 5 years ago because of the 'real-time' nature. I originally used to use Real Time Database, but now I use Cloud Firestore. I recommend using the Google Firebase PaaS to quickly develop or prototype small to enterprise level web/mobile applications. Since Google purchased Firebase, it has exploded and it growing rapidly. I also find some level of comfort that it is Backed by Google.

272k views272k
Comments
Noam
Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJSReactReact

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Firebase
Firebase
WebEngage
WebEngage

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

WebEngage is a customer engagement Saas. It enables gathering of relevant customer data through feedback and survey. It also enables notification of services and discounts to the market. WebEngage offers solution for personalized real time marketing, customer insights, instantaneous feedback and personalized marketing

Add the Firebase library to your app and get access to a shared data structure. Any changes made to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.;Firebase apps can be written entirely with client-side code, update in real-time out-of-the-box, interoperate well with existing services, scale automatically, and provide strong data security.;Data Accessibility- Data is stored as JSON in Firebase. Every piece of data has its own URL which can be used in Firebase's client libraries and as a REST endpoint. These URLs can also be entered into a browser to view the data and watch it update in real-time.;Real-time Synchronization- Firebase takes a new approach to the way data is moved around an app. Rather than using a traditional request & response model, it works by synchronizing data between devices. Whenever your data changes, all clients are immediately notified within milliseconds. The synchronized data is also persisted, allowing new clients to be immediately updated.;First-class Data Security- Traditional applications intermix security code with application code, whereas Firebase treats security as a first-class feature. You define your security policies in one place using a flexible rules language, and Firebase ensures that they are consistently enforced across all parts of your application. Having all your security logic in one place allows for easy auditing and helps you avoid security mistakes. The safety and security of your data is our top priority.;Automatic Scaling- The Firebase API is built from the ground up for performance and scale. Whenever your data changes, Firebase calculates the minimum set of updates required to keep all your clients in sync. In addition, all Firebase API functions are designed to scale linearly with the size of the data being synchronized. More importantly, Firebase handles all of the scaling and operations for you. Your app will scale from its first user to its first million without any code changes.;Servers are Optional- Firebase can provide all of the data storage, control, and transmission needs of most apps. In many cases, Firebase can completely replace your server and server-side code. This means you no longer need to build complicated backend software and can instead focus on your application logic and your customers.
Create highly targeted communication strategies; Customize experiences for each customer; Gain deep insights into your engagement strategies; Bring your marketing ideas to life in seconds
Statistics
Stacks
42.5K
Stacks
22
Followers
36.0K
Followers
28
Votes
2.0K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
Cons
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
Pros
  • 1
    It's super useful for surveys, and push notifications
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
Famo.us
Famo.us
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Ember.js
Ember.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Blogger
Blogger
Tumblr
Tumblr

What are some alternatives to Firebase, WebEngage?

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

InVision

InVision

InVision lets you create stunningly realistic interactive wireframes and prototypes without compromising your creative vision.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase