StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Express Gateway vs Ocelot

Express Gateway vs Ocelot

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Express Gateway
Express Gateway
Stacks62
Followers167
Votes10
Ocelot
Ocelot
Stacks83
Followers283
Votes4
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks1.7K

Express Gateway vs Ocelot: What are the differences?

Introduction

Express Gateway and Ocelot are both open-source API gateway solutions used for managing and securing APIs. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Performance: Ocelot, built on ASP.NET Core, is known for its exceptional performance and low latency, making it a preferred choice for high-performance applications. Express Gateway, on the other hand, utilizes Node.js and offers good performance but may not be as optimized as Ocelot in terms of speed and efficiency.

  2. Ecosystem: Express Gateway benefits from the rich and extensive Node.js ecosystem, which provides a wide range of modules, libraries, and tools. This allows developers to seamlessly integrate with various Node.js modules and makes it easier to find community support. Ocelot, being built on ASP.NET Core, also has a strong ecosystem with a vast array of libraries and tools that cater specifically to .NET developers.

  3. Configuration: Express Gateway follows a declarative configuration approach, where policies and routes are defined using JSON or YAML files. This makes it easy to understand, manage, and version control the configuration. Ocelot, on the other hand, uses a more programmatic configuration approach using C#, which provides developers with more flexibility and control over the configuration, especially when complex routing or policy customization is required.

  4. Scalability: Ocelot is designed to scale horizontally by distributing the load across multiple instances. It can leverage the infrastructure provided by cloud platforms like Kubernetes and Azure Service Fabric to handle high loads effectively. Express Gateway, being built on Node.js, can also scale horizontally, but may not be as well-suited for handling extremely high loads or large-scale deployments as Ocelot.

  5. Logging and Monitoring: Express Gateway provides built-in support for logging and monitoring through integrations with popular tools like Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana, and StatsD. It offers real-time metrics and a dashboard for monitoring API traffic. Ocelot, while it does not provide built-in logging and monitoring capabilities, can easily integrate with existing logging and monitoring solutions provided by the .NET ecosystem.

  6. Community Support: Express Gateway benefits from a large and active community of Node.js developers, which ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and new feature additions. It also provides extensive documentation and examples to facilitate development. Ocelot, being part of the .NET ecosystem, also has a strong community support system with active contributions, but it may not be as expansive as the Node.js community.

In summary, Express Gateway and Ocelot differ in terms of performance, ecosystem, configuration approaches, scalability, logging and monitoring capabilities, and community support. The choice between the two would depend on specific project requirements, the technology stack being used, and the expertise of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Express Gateway
Express Gateway
Ocelot
Ocelot

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Authentication;Authorization;API Management;Microservices;JSON Web Token (JWT);OAuth2;Custom Plugins;Consumer Mgmt;YAML Driven; REST API;Pipelines;Built-in Policies;Hot Reload and Restart;Actions & Conditions;
Routing; Request Aggregation; Service Discovery with Consul & Eureka; Service Fabric; Kubernetes; WebSockets; Authentication; Authorisation; Rate Limiting; Caching
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
62
Stacks
83
Followers
167
Followers
283
Votes
10
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Microservices, Body manipulation
  • 3
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Amazing api gwy. Easy and powerful configuration
Cons
  • 2
    Deprecated
Pros
  • 2
    Straightforward documentation
  • 2
    Simple configuration
Integrations
Prometheus
Prometheus
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
StatsD
StatsD
Node.js
Node.js
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
GraphQL
GraphQL
.NET
.NET
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Express Gateway, Ocelot?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Claudia

Claudia

Claudia helps you deploy Node.js microservices to Amazon Web Services easily. It automates and simplifies deployment workflows and error prone tasks, so you can focus on important problems and not have to worry about AWS service quirks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana