StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Envoy vs Istio

Envoy vs Istio

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Istio
Istio
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.5K
Votes54
GitHub Stars37.6K
Forks8.1K
Envoy
Envoy
Stacks304
Followers546
Votes9
GitHub Stars27.0K
Forks5.1K

Envoy vs Istio: What are the differences?

Envoy and Istio are popular technologies for managing and securing microservices in cloud-native environments. Envoy is a high-performance proxy, while Istio is a comprehensive service mesh platform. Here are the key differences between Envoy and Istio:

  1. Scope and Functionality: Envoy is a high-performance, open-source edge, and service proxy designed for modern architectures. It focuses on handling network traffic between services, providing features like load balancing, routing, traffic management, and observability. Envoy acts as a data plane component and can be used independently or as part of other service mesh solutions. On the other hand, Istio is a full-featured service mesh platform that leverages Envoy as its default sidecar proxy. Istio provides a comprehensive set of capabilities for traffic management, security, policy enforcement, and observability. It acts as a control plane and manages the configuration and behavior of the Envoy proxies deployed alongside services.

  2. Service Mesh Features: Istio provides additional features beyond what Envoy offers as a standalone proxy that includes intelligent routing, traffic splitting, canary deployments, fault injection, circuit breaking, service-level authentication, authorization, and observability through distributed tracing, metrics, and logging. These features allow developers to implement advanced traffic management and security patterns within their microservices architecture. Envoy, while powerful as a proxy, does not provide the same level of service mesh-specific features that Istio offers.

  3. Architecture and Integration: Envoy is designed to be a standalone component that can be integrated into various application stacks. It supports different deployment scenarios and can be used with or without a service mesh. Envoy is language-agnostic and can be used with applications written in different programming languages. On the other hand, Istio is built on top of Envoy and provides a higher-level abstraction for managing service-to-service communication. Istio integrates deeply with Kubernetes and is often used in Kubernetes-based environments. Istio leverages Envoy's capabilities and provides a control plane for managing and configuring the Envoy proxies.

  4. Complexity and Learning Curve: Envoy is a standalone proxy with a simpler learning curve, while Istio introduces additional complexity with its comprehensive feature set and control plane components. Envoy can be configured using its own files or APIs, while Istio requires working with custom resource definitions (CRDs) and specific components like gateways and virtual services.

In summary, Envoy and Istio are both powerful tools for managing and securing service-to-service communication in modern architectures. Envoy serves as a high-performance edge and service proxy, while Istio provides a complete service mesh platform built on top of Envoy.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Istio, Envoy

Prateek
Prateek

Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k
Comments
lyc218
lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.7k views42.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Istio
Istio
Envoy
Envoy

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
37.6K
GitHub Stars
27.0K
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
5.1K
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
304
Followers
1.5K
Followers
546
Votes
54
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Resiliency
  • 5
    Powerful authorization mechanisms
Cons
  • 17
    Performance
Pros
  • 9
    GRPC-Web
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Istio, Envoy?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana