StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elasticsearch vs rasa NLU

Elasticsearch vs rasa NLU

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
rasa NLU
rasa NLU
Stacks120
Followers282
Votes25

Elasticsearch vs rasa NLU: What are the differences?

Introduction

Elasticsearch and Rasa NLU are two popular tools used in different aspects of data processing and analysis. While Elasticsearch is a powerful search and analytics engine, Rasa NLU is an open-source natural language understanding library. Despite serving different purposes, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: One of the key differences between Elasticsearch and Rasa NLU is their architecture. Elasticsearch is a distributed system that works on a cluster of nodes, allowing for horizontal scaling and improved performance. On the other hand, Rasa NLU is a standalone library that can be integrated into chatbots or virtual assistants.

  2. Focus: Elasticsearch primarily focuses on full-text search and indexing capabilities. It is optimized for handling large datasets and performing complex search queries. Rasa NLU, on the other hand, is specifically designed for natural language understanding tasks, such as intent classification and entity extraction. It provides tools and models to process and understand user queries.

  3. Language Support: Elasticsearch supports multiple languages out of the box, thanks to its powerful text analysis and tokenization features. It can handle different languages with customizable analyzers. Rasa NLU also supports multiple languages, but the availability of pre-trained models and community support might vary for different languages.

  4. Domain-Specific Functionality: Elasticsearch provides various domain-specific functionalities through plugins, such as geo-location search, time series analysis, and machine learning capabilities. These plugins extend the core features of Elasticsearch, allowing users to perform specialized tasks. Rasa NLU, on the other hand, excels in the field of natural language understanding with built-in features like entity recognition, intent classification, and dialogue management.

  5. Data Storage: Elasticsearch uses its own indexing and storage mechanisms to maintain and query the data. It uses a distributed setup with indexes and shards to provide high availability and fault tolerance. Rasa NLU, on the other hand, does not have built-in data storage capabilities. It relies on external databases or file systems to store training data and models.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Elasticsearch has a large and active community with extensive documentation, plugins, and resources available. It is widely used in various industries for search and analytics purposes. Rasa NLU, although gaining popularity, has a smaller community in comparison. However, Rasa NLU benefits from the broader Rasa ecosystem, which includes Rasa Core for dialogue management and Rasa X for model training and deployment.

In summary, while Elasticsearch is a distributed search and analytics engine with extensive language support and domain-specific functionalities, Rasa NLU is a standalone library focused on natural language understanding tasks with a smaller community but strong integration with the broader Rasa ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, rasa NLU

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
rasa NLU
rasa NLU

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

rasa NLU (Natural Language Understanding) is a tool for intent classification and entity extraction. You can think of rasa NLU as a set of high level APIs for building your own language parser using existing NLP and ML libraries.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Open source; NLP; Machine learning
Statistics
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
120
Followers
27.1K
Followers
282
Votes
1.6K
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 9
    Open Source
  • 6
    Docker Image
  • 6
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    Comes with rasa_core
  • 1
    Enterprise Ready
Cons
  • 4
    Wdfsdf
  • 4
    No interface provided
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Slack
Slack
RocketChat
RocketChat
Google Hangouts Chat
Google Hangouts Chat
Telegram
Telegram
Microsoft Bot Framework
Microsoft Bot Framework
Twilio
Twilio
Mattermost
Mattermost

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, rasa NLU?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

SpaCy

SpaCy

It is a library for advanced Natural Language Processing in Python and Cython. It's built on the very latest research, and was designed from day one to be used in real products. It comes with pre-trained statistical models and word vectors, and currently supports tokenization for 49+ languages.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Quickwit

Quickwit

It is the next-gen search & analytics engine built for logs. It is designed from the ground up to offer cost-efficiency and high reliability on large data sets. Its benefits are most apparent in multi-tenancy or multi-index settings.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope