StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Compose vs Dokku

Docker Compose vs Dokku

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
Dokku
Dokku
Stacks180
Followers216
Votes69
GitHub Stars31.4K
Forks2.0K

Docker Compose vs Dokku: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Compose and Dokku are both tools used for containerization and deployment in the world of DevOps. However, they have distinct differences that make them suitable for different use cases. This markdown will outline the key differences between Docker Compose and Dokku, highlighting their unique features and functionalities.

  1. Ease of Setup and Management: Docker Compose requires manual setup and management of containers, networks, and volumes. On the other hand, Dokku provides a more streamlined experience with its one-click installation and easy management through a web-based GUI.

  2. Scalability: Docker Compose is designed for multi-container environments and is capable of scaling applications across multiple hosts and machines using swarm mode. In contrast, Dokku is more focused on single-host deployments and does not support scaling across multiple machines.

  3. Deployment Methods: While both Docker Compose and Dokku allow for container deployment, Docker Compose requires the use of a Docker host or an orchestration tool like Kubernetes. Dokku, on the other hand, simplifies the deployment process by providing a Heroku-like platform that enables easy push-to-deploy functionality.

  4. Monitoring and Logging: Docker Compose has limited built-in support for monitoring and logging, often requiring the use of third-party tools. In contrast, Dokku offers built-in support for monitoring and logging of applications, making it easier to track and troubleshoot issues.

  5. Plugins and Extensibility: Docker Compose comes with a wide range of official and community-contributed plugins, allowing for easy integration with various third-party tools and services. Dokku, although it offers some plugins, has a more limited selection and may require additional configuration for specific use cases.

  6. Backward Compatibility: Docker Compose supports backward compatibility for older versions of Docker, ensuring that applications can be run on different environments. Dokku, on the other hand, may require updates or adjustments to work with newer versions of Docker and its related components.

In summary, Docker Compose and Dokku offer distinct approaches to containerization and deployment. Docker Compose provides more scalability and flexibility for multi-container environments, while Dokku simplifies the deployment process with its easy setup and one-click deployment. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Dokku
Dokku

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

-
Open source PAAS alternative to Heroku; No vendor lock-in; Getting started is extremely easy; Extensible & customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
31.4K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
180
Followers
16.5K
Followers
216
Votes
501
Votes
69
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Pros
  • 23
    Simple
  • 12
    Open Source
  • 11
    Free
  • 11
    Built on Docker
  • 4
    Git deploy
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Semaphore
Semaphore
Drone.io
Drone.io
CloudBees
CloudBees
Arch Linux
Arch Linux
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, Dokku?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot