StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. DigitalOcean Load Balancer vs nginx

DigitalOcean Load Balancer vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
DigitalOcean Load Balancer
DigitalOcean Load Balancer
Stacks89
Followers94
Votes0

DigitalOcean Load Balancer vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

DigitalOcean Load Balancer and nginx are both popular tools used for load balancing in web applications. However, there are key differences between these two that make them suitable for different use cases. In this article, we will explore the main differences between DigitalOcean Load Balancer and nginx.

  1. Scalability: One key difference between DigitalOcean Load Balancer and nginx is their scalability. DigitalOcean Load Balancer is a managed service provided by DigitalOcean, which means that it is designed to automatically scale as the traffic to your application increases. On the other hand, nginx is a software that needs to be installed and configured on your own servers, so you will need to manually scale your infrastructure as needed.

  2. Ease of Use: When it comes to ease of use, DigitalOcean Load Balancer has an advantage over nginx. DigitalOcean Load Balancer is a fully managed service, which means that you don't need to worry about provisioning and configuring servers. All you need to do is create the load balancer, define your backend droplets, and DigitalOcean will take care of the rest. With nginx, you will need to manually set up and configure your servers, which can be more time-consuming and require more technical expertise.

  3. Features: DigitalOcean Load Balancer offers a range of features that are tailored specifically for load balancing, such as session persistence, SSL termination, and health checks. These features are built-in and can be easily configured through the DigitalOcean control panel. On the other hand, nginx is a versatile web server and reverse proxy that can also be used for load balancing. However, you will need to manually configure these features using nginx configuration files.

  4. Performance: Performance is another key difference between DigitalOcean Load Balancer and nginx. DigitalOcean Load Balancer is designed to be optimized for high-performance, with built-in load balancing algorithms and caching capabilities. It also uses SSD storage for faster I/O operations. Nginx, on the other hand, is known for its high-performance and efficiency in handling a large number of concurrent connections. It is highly configurable and optimized for performance, making it a popular choice for high-traffic websites.

  5. Cost: DigitalOcean Load Balancer is a paid service and the cost depends on the number of forwarding rules you create. The pricing starts at $10 per month. On the other hand, nginx is open-source software and free to use, which can be advantageous for smaller budgets or organizations with specific customization requirements.

  6. Flexibility: Lastly, flexibility is another important difference between DigitalOcean Load Balancer and nginx. DigitalOcean Load Balancer is a managed service with limited customization options. It provides a simple and easy-to-use interface, but it may not be suitable for complex configurations or specific use cases. On the other hand, nginx is a highly flexible tool that allows you to customize almost every aspect of its configuration. This makes it suitable for advanced load balancing configurations and more complex use cases.

In Summary, DigitalOcean Load Balancer is a managed service that offers scalability, ease of use, and built-in load balancing features, while nginx is a highly customizable software that excels in performance and flexibility. The choice between these two depends on the specific requirements of your application and your level of technical expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, DigitalOcean Load Balancer

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
DigitalOcean Load Balancer
DigitalOcean Load Balancer

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Load Balancers are a highly available, fully-managed service that work right out of the box and can be deployed as fast as a Droplet. Load Balancers distribute incoming traffic across your infrastructure to increase your application's availability.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
89
Followers
61.9K
Followers
94
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Cons
  • 1
    No Let's Encrypt wildcard certificate support
Integrations
No integrations available
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean

What are some alternatives to NGINX, DigitalOcean Load Balancer?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot