StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Stream Processing
  5. Confluent vs riko

Confluent vs riko

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

riko
riko
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks75
Confluent
Confluent
Stacks337
Followers239
Votes14

riko vs Confluent: What are the differences?

riko: A Python stream processing engine modeled after Yahoo! Pipes. riko is a pure Python library for analyzing and processing streams of structured data. riko has synchronous and asynchronous APIs, supports parallel execution, and is well suited for processing RSS feeds. riko also supplies a command-line interface for executing flows, i.e., stream processors aka workflows; Confluent: We make a stream data platform to help companies harness their high volume real-time data streams. It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream.

riko and Confluent can be categorized as "Stream Processing" tools.

Some of the features offered by riko are:

  • Read csv/xml/json/html files
  • Create text and data based flows via modular pipes
  • Parse, extract, and process RSS/Atom feeds

On the other hand, Confluent provides the following key features:

  • Reliable
  • High-performance stream data platform
  • Manage and organize data from different sources.

riko is an open source tool with 1.47K GitHub stars and 67 GitHub forks. Here's a link to riko's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

riko
riko
Confluent
Confluent

riko is a pure Python library for analyzing and processing streams of structured data. riko has synchronous and asynchronous APIs, supports parallel execution, and is well suited for processing RSS feeds. riko also supplies a command-line interface for executing flows, i.e., stream processors aka workflows.

It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

Read csv/xml/json/html files;Create text and data based flows via modular pipes;Parse, extract, and process RSS/Atom feeds;Create awesome mashups, APIs, and maps;Perform parallel processing via cpus/processors or threads
Reliable; High-performance stream data platform; Manage and organize data from different sources.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
75
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
0
Stacks
337
Followers
6
Followers
239
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Free for casual use
  • 3
    No hypercloud lock-in
  • 3
    Dashboard for kafka insight
  • 2
    Easily scalable
  • 2
    Zero devops
Cons
  • 1
    Proprietary
Integrations
Python
Python
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Java
Java
Python
Python
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Kafka Streams
Kafka Streams

What are some alternatives to riko, Confluent?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase