StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Confluent vs Hutch

Confluent vs Hutch

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hutch
Hutch
Stacks7
Followers9
Votes0
Confluent
Confluent
Stacks337
Followers239
Votes14

Hutch vs Confluent: What are the differences?

Hutch: Inter-Service Communication with RabbitMQ. Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ; Confluent: We make a stream data platform to help companies harness their high volume real-time data streams. It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream.

Hutch belongs to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack, while Confluent can be primarily classified under "Stream Processing".

Some of the features offered by Hutch are:

  • A simple way to define consumers (queues are automatically created and bound to the exchange with the appropriate binding keys)
  • An executable and CLI for running consumers (akin to rake resque:work)
  • Automatic setup of the central exchange

On the other hand, Confluent provides the following key features:

  • Reliable
  • High-performance stream data platform
  • Manage and organize data from different sources.

Hutch is an open source tool with 713 GitHub stars and 104 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Hutch's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hutch
Hutch
Confluent
Confluent

Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.

It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

A simple way to define consumers (queues are automatically created and bound to the exchange with the appropriate binding keys);An executable and CLI for running consumers (akin to rake resque:work);Automatic setup of the central exchange;Sensible out-of-the-box configuration (e.g. durable messages, persistent queues, message acknowledgements);Management of queue subscriptions;Rails integration;Configurable exception handling
Reliable; High-performance stream data platform; Manage and organize data from different sources.
Statistics
Stacks
7
Stacks
337
Followers
9
Followers
239
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Free for casual use
  • 3
    No hypercloud lock-in
  • 3
    Dashboard for kafka insight
  • 2
    Easily scalable
  • 2
    Zero devops
Cons
  • 1
    Proprietary
Integrations
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Java
Java
Python
Python
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Kafka Streams
Kafka Streams

What are some alternatives to Hutch, Confluent?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase