StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bulma vs Vuetify

Bulma vs Vuetify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bulma
Bulma
Stacks780
Followers855
Votes38
GitHub Stars50.0K
Forks3.9K
Vuetify
Vuetify
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.8K
Votes170
GitHub Stars40.8K
Forks7.1K

Bulma vs Vuetify: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bulma and Vuetify are two popular UI frameworks used for building websites and web applications. While both frameworks offer a wide range of components and features to create responsive and visually appealing interfaces, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Design Philosophy: Bulma is a lightweight, minimalistic CSS framework that focuses on providing a simple and flexible grid system along with a set of utility classes. It offers a clean and modern design with a modular architecture, allowing developers to customize and extend the framework as per their requirements. On the other hand, Vuetify is a comprehensive Material Design component framework built specifically for Vue.js. It follows the Material Design guidelines, providing pre-designed components based on Google's design language, making it easier to achieve a consistent and polished look for web applications.

  2. Component Library: Bulma offers a limited set of components compared to Vuetify. It includes basics like buttons, forms, cards, modals, and navigation elements. While it provides a solid foundation for building websites, developers may need to rely on additional libraries or custom CSS to implement more complex features. Vuetify, on the other hand, provides an extensive collection of ready-to-use components that follow the Material Design principles. It includes a variety of UI elements such as grids, buttons, dialogs, data tables, navigation bars, and more, allowing developers to quickly and easily build feature-rich applications without the need for additional libraries.

  3. Integration with Vue.js: While both frameworks can be used with Vue.js, Vuetify is designed specifically for Vue and provides seamless integration with its ecosystem. Vuetify offers Vue-specific features like directive-based transitions, convenient helper components, and easy integration with Vue Router and Vuex. It also leverages Vue's reactivity system and allows for efficient component-level updates. Bulma, on the other hand, is a standalone CSS framework and does not have direct integration with Vue.js. Although it can be used alongside Vue, developers need to manually handle component state and lifecycle hooks.

  4. Styling and Customization: Bulma provides a clean and customizable foundation with sensible defaults. It offers various utility classes and a straightforward way to override default styles using custom CSS. However, it requires more manual effort and CSS knowledge to create a completely unique and customized design. Vuetify, on the other hand, provides a set of predefined styles and themes that can be easily customized using SCSS variables or the built-in theming system. This allows developers to quickly change the overall look and feel of the application while maintaining consistency with the Material Design guidelines.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: Both Bulma and Vuetify provide comprehensive documentation with examples, tutorials, and guides. However, Vuetify has a more active and larger community compared to Bulma, which means it has more readily available resources and community support. Vuetify also benefits from being a part of the larger Vue.js community, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and receive help when needed.

  6. File Size and Performance: Bulma is known for its lightweight nature, with a file size of around 200KB. This makes it suitable for projects where performance and load times are a priority. On the other hand, Vuetify has a larger file size due to its extensive component library and additional dependencies. While Vuetify offers more out-of-the-box features, it may result in slower load times and increased bundle size, especially for small or performance-sensitive projects.

In Summary, Bulma is a lightweight and flexible CSS framework with a modular architecture, while Vuetify is a comprehensive Material Design component framework specifically built for Vue.js, offering a wide range of pre-designed components and seamless integration with Vue ecosystem. Vuetify provides an extensive component library and follows the Material Design guidelines, making it easier to create visually appealing and consistent interfaces. However, Bulma offers more customization options and a smaller file size, making it suitable for projects where performance and minimalism are key. The choice between the two frameworks ultimately depends on specific project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bulma, Vuetify

Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bulma
Bulma
Vuetify
Vuetify

Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
50.0K
GitHub Stars
40.8K
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
Stacks
780
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
855
Followers
1.8K
Votes
38
Votes
170
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Community-created themes
  • 6
    Easy-to-customize the sass build
  • 5
    Great docs
  • 5
    Responsive
Cons
  • 2
    Not yet supporting Vue 3
Pros
  • 29
    Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs
  • 24
    Wide range of components and active development
  • 22
    Vue
  • 18
    New age components
  • 13
    Easy integration
Cons
  • 19
    It is heavy
  • 3
    Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Bulma, Vuetify?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase