StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Zend Framework

Bootstrap vs Zend Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Stacks262
Followers215
Votes48

Bootstrap vs Zend Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bootstrap is a popular open-source front-end framework that simplifies the process of designing websites by providing pre-built components and styles. On the other hand, Zend Framework is a powerful PHP framework that aims to facilitate the development of robust and scalable web applications.

  1. Development Focus: Bootstrap is primarily focused on providing a responsive and mobile-first approach to web design. It offers a wide range of ready-to-use CSS classes, JavaScript components, and a grid system, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing websites quickly. In contrast, Zend Framework focuses on providing a complete MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture and various components for building highly scalable and enterprise-level web applications.

  2. Community Support: Bootstrap has a massive community of developers and a vast number of online resources available. Developers can find extensive documentation, ready-made themes, and numerous tutorials, which significantly ease the learning curve. On the other hand, Zend Framework also has a supportive community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Bootstrap. However, Zend Framework benefits from being sponsored by Zend Technologies, ensuring professional support and documentation.

  3. Code Reusability: Bootstrap emphasizes code reusability through its extensive library of pre-built components and styles. Developers can utilize these components across multiple projects, which helps in saving time and effort. In contrast, Zend Framework focuses more on providing a flexible architecture and a collection of reusable components for building complex web applications. It emphasizes code modularity and promotes a modular approach to software development.

  4. Applicability: Bootstrap is suitable for a wide range of web design projects, from simple websites to complex web applications. It is especially suitable for small to medium-sized projects that require quick prototyping or a consistent visual design. On the other hand, Zend Framework is more suitable for large-scale, enterprise-level web applications, where scalability, performance, and maintainability are critical factors.

  5. Learning Curve: Bootstrap has a relatively low learning curve, primarily due to its extensive documentation and plethora of online resources available. Developers with basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript can start using Bootstrap quickly. Conversely, learning Zend Framework often requires a greater level of PHP expertise and understanding of MVC architecture. It may take some time to become proficient in utilizing Zend Framework's capabilities effectively.

  6. Development Speed: Bootstrap enables rapid development by providing ready-made components and styles that can be easily integrated into web projects. This accelerates the development process, especially for designers and front-end developers. On the other hand, while Zend Framework allows for rapid development through its reusable components and powerful MVC architecture, building web applications with Zend Framework typically requires more time due to its focus on creating scalable and maintainable software.

In summary, Bootstrap focuses on responsive web design and offers ready-to-use components, while Zend Framework emphasizes enterprise-level web application development with a comprehensive MVC architecture and modular components. Bootstrap has a larger community and lower learning curve, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects, whereas Zend Framework is more suitable for large-scale, complex web applications that require scalability and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Zend Framework

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Zend Framework
Zend Framework

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

It is an open source framework for developing web applications and services using PHP 5.3+. It uses 100% object-oriented code and utilizes most of the new features of namely namespaces, late static binding, lambda functions and closures.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Pure object oriented web application framework; Advanced MVC implementation; Supports multi databases including PostgreSQL, SQLite etc; Simple cloud API; Session management; Data encryption; Flexible URI Routing; Zend provides RESTful API development support.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
262
Followers
13.2K
Followers
215
Votes
7.7K
Votes
48
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 25
    Open source
  • 11
    Community
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Many library
Integrations
No integrations available
Expressive
Expressive
PHP
PHP
GitHub
GitHub
Webex
Webex

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Zend Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase