StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Semantic UI vs Tailwind CSS

Bootstrap vs Semantic UI vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245

Bootstrap vs Semantic UI vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bootstrap, Semantic UI, and Tailwind CSS are popular front-end frameworks used to create responsive and visually appealing websites. Each of these frameworks has its own unique features and benefits. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between these three frameworks.

  1. Grid System:

    • Bootstrap: Bootstrap provides a powerful and flexible grid system that allows developers to create responsive layouts easily. It uses a twelve-column grid system.
    • Semantic UI: Semantic UI also offers a grid system but with a more semantic approach. It uses a sixteen-column grid system and puts emphasis on natural language class names.
    • Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS takes a different approach by offering a utility-first approach to styling. It provides a wide range of pre-built utility classes that can be combined to create custom layouts.
  2. Component Design:

    • Bootstrap: Bootstrap comes with a rich set of pre-built components like buttons, navigation bars, dropdowns, and modals. These components are designed to be ready to use out of the box.
    • Semantic UI: Semantic UI offers a similar set of pre-built components that are designed with the goal of creating beautiful and intuitive user interfaces. It also provides a wide range of customization options.
    • Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS doesn't come with pre-built components. Instead, it provides a set of utility classes that can be used to build custom components from scratch. This gives developers more control over the appearance and behavior of their components.
  3. Aesthetics and Theming:

    • Bootstrap: Bootstrap has a clean and modern design aesthetic. It comes with a default theme that can be easily customized using CSS variables or by overriding the default styles.
    • Semantic UI: Semantic UI focuses on providing a visually appealing design with a strong emphasis on typography. It offers a variety of themes and customization options to create visually consistent and stunning websites.
    • Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS takes a different approach by providing a utility-first design system. It doesn't have a default theme but allows developers to easily customize every aspect of the design using utility classes.
  4. File Size:

    • Bootstrap: Bootstrap has a larger file size compared to Semantic UI and Tailwind CSS. It includes a wide range of components and features, which can make it heavier for smaller projects.
    • Semantic UI: Semantic UI has a smaller file size compared to Bootstrap, but it can still be quite large for smaller projects. It offers a comprehensive set of components and features.
    • Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS has a smaller file size compared to both Bootstrap and Semantic UI. Due to its utility-first approach, it only includes the CSS classes that are actually used in the project, resulting in smaller file sizes.
  5. Customization:

    • Bootstrap: Bootstrap offers a wide range of customization options. It provides extensive documentation on how to customize the framework, including variables and mixins.
    • Semantic UI: Semantic UI also offers a good level of customization. It provides a theming system that allows developers to customize the look and feel of their websites easily.
    • Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS is highly customizable. It provides a configuration file that allows developers to customize every aspect of the design system, including colors, typography, spacing, and more.
  6. Learning Curve:

    • Bootstrap: Bootstrap has been widely adopted and has a large community, making it easier to find resources, documentation, and support. It also has a relatively low learning curve due to its intuitive API and extensive documentation.
    • Semantic UI: Semantic UI has a slightly steeper learning curve compared to Bootstrap. However, it provides comprehensive documentation and a helpful community to assist developers in their learning process.
    • Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS has a steeper learning curve compared to both Bootstrap and Semantic UI. It requires a good understanding of utility classes and the configuration system. However, it provides comprehensive documentation and an active community to support developers.

In Summary, Bootstrap, Semantic UI, and Tailwind CSS are all powerful front-end frameworks with their own unique features and benefits. Bootstrap focuses on providing a wide range of pre-built components and a flexible grid system. Semantic UI emphasizes beautiful and intuitive user interfaces with a semantic grid system. Tailwind CSS provides a utility-first design system with extensive customization options. Choosing the right framework depends on the specific needs of the project and the developer's preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Tailwind CSS

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
992
Stacks
4.8K
Followers
13.2K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
3.1K
Votes
7.7K
Votes
673
Votes
245
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Tailwind CSS?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Polymer

Polymer

Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase