Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Blue Ocean vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?
Introduction
Blue Ocean and Jenkins X are both continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools aimed at streamlining software development processes. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two.
User Interface: Blue Ocean provides a modern, intuitive user interface built on top of Jenkins, offering a visual representation of the entire software delivery pipeline. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users. On the other hand, Jenkins X has a command-line interface (CLI) and a web-based dashboard, which are more developer-centric and provide a more traditional CI/CD experience.
Focus and Functionality: Blue Ocean primarily focuses on visualizing and monitoring Jenkins pipelines, as well as facilitating collaboration and ease of use. It offers powerful visualization features, such as the pipeline editor, which allows users to drag and drop pipeline components. Additionally, Blue Ocean integrates with other DevOps tools, enabling users to manage their entire software delivery process from a single interface. In contrast, Jenkins X is designed specifically for cloud-native applications, leveraging Kubernetes for automatic scaling and deployment. It provides built-in support for popular cloud platforms and offers out-of-the-box capabilities for managing environments, promotion strategies, and automated rollbacks.
Pipeline Configuration: Blue Ocean makes it easier to configure and manage pipelines using a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to visually define pipeline stages, build triggers, and integrations with other tools. This encourages greater collaboration and simplifies the pipeline configuration process, especially for non-technical team members. On the other hand, Jenkins X follows a GitOps approach, where the pipeline is defined using YAML configuration files stored in the project's source code repository. This allows developers to have full control over the pipeline configuration and versioning, enabling a more standardized and scalable approach.
Built-in Features: Blue Ocean offers a wide range of built-in features, such as real-time pipeline visualization, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive plugin ecosystem. It also provides support for various plugins and extensions available in the Jenkins ecosystem. Jenkins X, on the other hand, focuses on built-in features specifically tailored for cloud-native applications, including container image management, automated release management, and preview environments for every pull request.
Installation and Setup: Setting up Blue Ocean requires installing and configuring Jenkins first, as it is essentially a user interface extension for Jenkins. This means that users need to have some familiarity with Jenkins to effectively use Blue Ocean. Jenkins X, however, comes with a bundled installation, providing an out-of-the-box experience that includes Jenkins as well as additional components required for cloud-native applications, such as Helm and Kubernetes.
Community and Support: Blue Ocean has a large and established user community and benefits from the extensive support and documentation available for Jenkins. It is a mature project with a strong ecosystem of plugins and extensions contributed by the Jenkins community. Jenkins X, being a more recent project, has a smaller but growing community, with a focus on cloud-native tools and practices. It benefits from the active contributions and support from the CNCF (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) community.
In summary, Blue Ocean offers a visually appealing and user-friendly experience, with powerful visualization and collaboration features, while Jenkins X is focused on cloud-native applications, providing out-of-the-box capabilities for managing modern software delivery pipelines.
We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.
Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.
We primarily need:
- Fast SBT builds (caching)
- Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
- Everything as code
- Ease of use
I think I've tried most of the CI tools out there at some point. It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself. Eventually it dawned on me why this approach was more ingenious than I realised:
Running my app in a production (or production-like) environment was already a solved problem, because everything was already in some form of "everything as code". Having a test environment where the only difference was adding the Buildkite agent was a trivial addition.
It means that dev/test/prod parity is simple to achieve and maintain. It's also proven to be much easier to support than trying to deal with the problems that come with trying to force an app to fit into the nuances and constraints that are imposed by the containers/runtime of a CI service. When you completely control all of the environment the tests are running in you define those constraints too. It's been a great balance between a managed service and the flexibility of running it yourself.
And while none of my needs have hit the scale of Shopify (I saw one of their engineers speak about it at a conference once, I can't find the video now though ๐) it's good to know I can scale out my worker nodes to hundreds of thousands of workers to reduce the time it takes for my tests to run.
I would recommend you to consider the JFrog Platform that includes JFrog Pipelines - it will allow you to manage the full artifact life cycle for your sbt, docker and other technologies, and automate all of your CI and CD using cloud native declarative yaml pipelines. Will integrate smoothly with all your other toolset.
more configurable to setup ci/cd: * It can provide caching when build sbt, just add this section to yml file * Easy to use, many documentation
Weakness: * Need use gitlab as repository to bring more powerful configuration
Pros of Blue Ocean
- Beautiful interface7
Pros of Jenkins X
- Kubernetes integration7
- Scripted Pipelines5
- GitOps4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Blue Ocean
Cons of Jenkins X
- Complexity1