StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. CDN
  4. CDN
  5. Azure Front Door vs F5

Azure Front Door vs F5

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Front Door
Azure Front Door
Stacks21
Followers53
Votes0
F5
F5
Stacks42
Followers44
Votes0

Azure Front Door vs F5: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Front Door and F5 are both popular solutions used for content delivery and load balancing. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two technologies. This article aims to highlight six specific differences between Azure Front Door and F5.

  1. Deployment Type: Azure Front Door is a cloud-native solution provided by Microsoft and is deployed and managed completely within the Azure environment. On the other hand, F5 is a hardware-based solution that requires separate physical or virtual appliances to be deployed in a data center or on-premises environment.

  2. Scalability and Global Reach: Azure Front Door offers global scalability and automatically integrates with Azure CDN, enabling efficient global content delivery. It has a wide range of points of presence (PoPs) distributed globally to ensure low-latency access to content. F5, on the other hand, needs to be manually configured and scaled to handle global traffic, making it less suitable for global deployments.

  3. Integration with Azure Services: Azure Front Door is deeply integrated with other Azure services, such as Azure Web Apps, API Management, and Azure Functions. This allows for seamless connection and improved performance between these services. F5 does not have direct integrations with Azure services and may require additional configurations or workarounds to achieve similar functionalities.

  4. Pricing Model: Azure Front Door employs a consumption-based pricing model, where you pay for the actual usage of the service components. This makes it cost-effective, especially for smaller workloads. F5, however, has a different pricing model, typically involving purchasing hardware or virtual appliances upfront, and then additional costs for licensing and support.

  5. Ease of Management and Updates: Azure Front Door provides a managed service experience, where Microsoft takes care of the underlying infrastructure and handles updates and maintenance. F5, being a hardware-based solution, requires more manual management and updates, which can be time-consuming and complex.

  6. Security and DDoS Protection: Azure Front Door incorporates Azure DDoS Protection Standard, providing enhanced security against distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. It also offers SSL/TLS termination and backend authentication. While F5 provides security features, it may require additional configurations or licenses to achieve similar levels of protection.

In summary, Azure Front Door is a cloud-native, highly scalable, and cost-effective solution deeply integrated with Azure services. It offers seamless management, global reach, and enhanced security. On the other hand, F5 is a hardware-based solution that requires manual management, scalability, and global reach configurations. It does not have the same level of integration with Azure services and may require more upfront investments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Front Door
Azure Front Door
F5
F5

The scalable and secure entry point for the fast delivery of your global applications. It enables you to define, manage, and monitor the global routing for your web traffic by optimizing for best performance and instant global failover for high availability.

It powers apps from development through their entire life cycle, so our customers can deliver differentiated, high-performing, and secure digital experiences.

Globally distributed microservice applications;Dynamic applications with global reach;Global, real-time performance and availability for your app or API;Scale up your global application;Protect your app from attacks;Centralised traffic orchestration view
-
Statistics
Stacks
21
Stacks
42
Followers
53
Followers
44
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Azure Front Door, F5?

CloudFlare

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

jsDelivr

jsDelivr

jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source developers, with advanced features for javascript projects with access to NPM and Github It uses multiple CDN providers, resulting in the best possible uptime and performance.

Moovweb XDN

Moovweb XDN

All-in-one platform to develop, deploy, preview, experiment on, monitor, and run your frontend.

Limelight CDN

Limelight CDN

Whether it’s your website, mobile applications, videos, music, software, games, or APIs, your content needs to reach customers quickly, reliably, and securely. It provides the capacity, coverage, and performance to cost-effectively deliver a better experience for you and your customers.

AWS Key Management Service

AWS Key Management Service

AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data, and uses Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) to protect the security of your keys. AWS Key Management Service is integrated with other AWS services including Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Key Management Service is also integrated with AWS CloudTrail to provide you with logs of all key usage to help meet your regulatory and compliance needs.

cdnjs

cdnjs

Everyone loves the Google CDN? Even Microsoft runs their own CDN. The problem is, they only host the most popular libraries. We host it all - JavaScript, CSS, SWF, images, etc! Powered by CloudFlare.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase