StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Azure App Service vs Azure Service Fabric

Azure App Service vs Azure Service Fabric

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Stacks103
Followers284
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks399
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks313
Followers380
Votes11

Azure App Service vs Azure Service Fabric: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure App Service and Azure Service Fabric are both PaaS (Platform-as-a-Service) offerings from Microsoft Azure that allow developers to build and deploy applications easily. However, there are key differences between them that make each of them suitable for different types of applications and scenarios.

1. Scalability and Flexibility: Azure App Service is designed primarily for traditional web, mobile, and API applications. It provides a fully managed platform for building, deploying, and scaling web apps quickly. With App Service, developers can easily scale their applications vertically or horizontally depending on the workload. On the other hand, Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that is optimized for building highly scalable, stateful, and microservices-based applications. It provides deep control over the application's lifecycle and allows developers to deploy and manage microservices at scale.

2. Programming Models: Azure App Service supports a wide range of programming languages including .NET, Java, Node.js, Python, and PHP. It also provides support for popular frameworks like ASP.NET, Django, Flask, and Express.js. On the other hand, Azure Service Fabric supports multiple programming models including Reliable Services and Reliable Actors. These programming models abstract the underlying infrastructure and provide a simplified way to build, deploy, and manage highly scalable and reliable applications.

3. State Management: Azure App Service is designed to be stateless by default. It does not provide built-in support for managing and persisting application state. However, developers can use external storage options like Azure Storage, Azure SQL Database, or Redis Cache to manage state if needed. Azure Service Fabric, on the other hand, provides built-in support for managing the state of microservices. It includes a reliable and distributed state management system that simplifies the development of highly available and scalable applications.

4. High Availability and Fault Tolerance: Azure App Service provides high availability and fault tolerance by automatically distributing and load balancing application instances across multiple servers. It also provides built-in mechanisms for monitoring and autoscaling based on the workload. Azure Service Fabric, on the other hand, is designed to handle failure and recover from it gracefully. It provides built-in mechanisms for handling failures, including automatic failover, stateful service replication, and service healing.

5. Service Orchestration and Composition: Azure App Service is primarily focused on hosting individual applications, and it does not provide advanced built-in support for service orchestration and composition. Azure Service Fabric, on the other hand, provides capabilities for service orchestration and composition. It allows developers to define and manage complex workflows using the built-in actor model and reliable services, making it suitable for building complex distributed systems.

6. Deployment Flexibility: Azure App Service provides a simple and straightforward deployment model. Developers can deploy applications directly from source control systems like GitHub, Azure DevOps, or Bitbucket. They can also choose between deploying as code or deploying a containerized application. Azure Service Fabric provides more deployment flexibility. Developers can deploy applications as containers, guest executables, or as managed services. They can also choose between deploying to a single cluster or deploying to a multi-cluster environment.

In Summary, Azure App Service is ideal for traditional web, mobile, and API applications, offering scalability, flexibility, and support for various programming languages. Azure Service Fabric, on the other hand, is optimized for highly scalable, stateful, and microservices-based applications, providing advanced features for state management, high availability, service orchestration, and deployment flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Azure App Service
Azure App Service

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

Simplify microservices development and application lifecycle management; Reliably scale and orchestrate containers and microservices; Data-aware platform for low-latency, high-throughput workloads with stateful containers or microservices; Run anything – your choice of languages and programming models; Run anywhere – supports Windows/Linux in Azure, on-premises, or other clouds; Scales up to thousands of machines
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
399
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
103
Stacks
313
Followers
284
Followers
380
Votes
26
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Intelligent, fast, reliable
  • 4
    Runs most of Azure core services
  • 3
    Reliability
  • 3
    Superior programming models
  • 3
    More reliable than Kubernetes
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Azure Service Fabric, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot