AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

2.1K
1.8K
+ 1
241
Google App Engine

10K
7.8K
+ 1
610
Add tool

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine are both Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings that allow developers to quickly deploy and manage their applications on the cloud. However, there are key differences between the two services that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility in terms of infrastructure options. It allows developers to customize the underlying infrastructure, choose from a wide range of EC2 instance types, and integrate with other AWS services. On the other hand, Google App Engine abstracts away the infrastructure details and provides automatic scalability, making it easier to scale applications without worrying about provisioning and managing resources.

  2. Pricing Model: AWS Elastic Beanstalk follows an a-la-carte pricing model, where each AWS resource (such as EC2 instances, S3 buckets, etc.) is billed separately. This gives developers more control over cost optimization, but requires more management and monitoring. In contrast, Google App Engine has a more bundled pricing model, where the cost includes both infrastructure and platform services. This can make it simpler to estimate costs, but may be less flexible for organizations with specific resource needs.

  3. Supported Languages and Runtimes: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers support for a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and runtimes such as Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, and more. It provides a more language-agnostic approach, making it suitable for multi-language environments. On the other hand, Google App Engine focuses more on specific languages and runtimes, primarily supporting Java, Python, Go, and Node.js. It provides tighter integration with Google Cloud services, but may be less suitable for organizations with diverse technology stacks.

  4. Deployment Process: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides more flexibility in terms of deployment options. It supports various deployment methods such as direct file uploads, Git integration, Docker containers, and more. This allows developers to choose the most suitable deployment process for their applications. In contrast, Google App Engine has a more streamlined deployment process, focusing on deploying code using Google Cloud SDK or through integration with popular development tools such as Maven or Gradle.

  5. Monitoring and Logging: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides detailed monitoring and logging capabilities through integration with AWS CloudWatch. It allows developers to collect, monitor, and analyze application logs and performance metrics. Google App Engine also provides monitoring and logging features, but it leverages Google Cloud Monitoring and Google Cloud Logging services for this purpose. The choice between the two services may depend on the organization's existing monitoring and logging infrastructure.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility and customization options, a la carte pricing, and support for a wide range of languages and runtimes. Google App Engine, on the other hand, provides automatic scalability, bundled pricing, closer integration with Google Cloud services, and a streamlined deployment process. The choice between the two services depends on the specific needs and preferences of the organization.

Decisions about AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine
Mehdi Baaboura
Managing Director at Gigadrive · | 7 upvotes · 11.3K views

Platform.sh has great out-of-the-box support for PHP apps (especially Symfony, as it was made by the same people). Elastic Beanstalk does not have a lot of compelling PaaS features like Platform.sh. There, you have to install a lot of PHP extensions manually for example, while Platform.sh just handles it for you based on your config. Elastic Beanstalk also has terrible version updates (see link).

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Pros of Google App Engine
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
  • 4
    Well-documented
  • 3
    Independend app container
  • 2
    Postgres hosting
  • 2
    Ability to be customized
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
  • 35
    Low cost
  • 32
    Comprehensive set of features
  • 28
    All services in one place
  • 22
    Simple scaling
  • 19
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 6
    Granular Billing
  • 5
    Easy to develop and unit test
  • 4
    Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators
  • 3
    Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack
  • 3
    Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints
  • 2
    Mostly up
  • 2
    No Ops

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Cons of Google App Engine
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
    What companies use Google App Engine?
    See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Elastic Beanstalk or Google App Engine.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
    What tools integrate with Google App Engine?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine?
    AWS CodeDeploy
    AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    AWS CloudFormation
    You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.
    Azure App Service
    Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    See all alternatives