AWS CodeStar vs HatchBox

Overview

AWS CodeStar

Stacks24

Followers171

Votes8

HatchBox

Stacks9

Followers10

Votes0

AWS CodeStar vs HatchBox: What are the differences?

Development Ecosystem: AWS CodeStar is an integrated development environment (IDE) that allows users to develop, build, and deploy applications on AWS easily, with automated pipelines for continuous integrations and deployment. In contrast, HatchBox is a platform that focuses on deploying Ruby on Rails applications quickly to production servers, simplifying the deployment process for Rails developers.
Supported Technologies: AWS CodeStar supports a wide range of programming languages such as JavaScript, Java, Python, and Ruby, making it versatile for different types of applications. On the other hand, HatchBox specifically caters to Ruby on Rails applications and provides specialized tools and features for optimizing the deployment of Rails projects.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeStar follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources they consume. In contrast, HatchBox offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly fee for access to the platform's deployment services.
Scalability: AWS CodeStar is designed to handle scalable applications with built-in support for AWS services like AWS Lambda and Amazon RDS. HatchBox, while efficient for deploying Rails applications, may have limitations when it comes to scaling to larger, more complex systems.
Collaboration Features: AWS CodeStar provides collaboration tools for team members to work on projects together, with support for code reviews, pull requests, and issue tracking. HatchBox, while focused on deployment, may not offer the same level of collaboration features for teams working on Rails projects.

In Summary, AWS CodeStar and HatchBox differ in terms of their development ecosystems, supported technologies, pricing models, scalability, and collaboration features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeStar	HatchBox
Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.	Configure any server to run Ruby on Rails servers in minutes and without hassle.
Start developing on AWS in minutes;Manage software delivery in one place;Work across your team securely;Choose from a variety of project templates	Choose your hosting provider; ActionCable; Automatic Databases; Customizable Nginx; Redis Support; Sidekiq; SSL & Lets Encrypt; Environment Variables; Secure By Default
Statistics
Stacks 24	Stacks 9
Followers 171	Followers 10
Votes 8	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Simple to set up 2 Manual Steps Available 1 GitHub integration 1 Integrations 1 Flexible	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon EC2 AWS Lambda AWS Elastic Beanstalk Jira	Rails Redis Sidekiq PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeStar, HatchBox?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeStar vs HatchBox: What are the differences?

Development Ecosystem: AWS CodeStar is an integrated development environment (IDE) that allows users to develop, build, and deploy applications on AWS easily, with automated pipelines for continuous integrations and deployment. In contrast, HatchBox is a platform that focuses on deploying Ruby on Rails applications quickly to production servers, simplifying the deployment process for Rails developers.
Supported Technologies: AWS CodeStar supports a wide range of programming languages such as JavaScript, Java, Python, and Ruby, making it versatile for different types of applications. On the other hand, HatchBox specifically caters to Ruby on Rails applications and provides specialized tools and features for optimizing the deployment of Rails projects.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeStar follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources they consume. In contrast, HatchBox offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly fee for access to the platform's deployment services.
Scalability: AWS CodeStar is designed to handle scalable applications with built-in support for AWS services like AWS Lambda and Amazon RDS. HatchBox, while efficient for deploying Rails applications, may have limitations when it comes to scaling to larger, more complex systems.
Collaboration Features: AWS CodeStar provides collaboration tools for team members to work on projects together, with support for code reviews, pull requests, and issue tracking. HatchBox, while focused on deployment, may not offer the same level of collaboration features for teams working on Rails projects.

In Summary, AWS CodeStar and HatchBox differ in terms of their development ecosystems, supported technologies, pricing models, scalability, and collaboration features.

AWS CodeStar vs HatchBox

Overview