AWS CodePipeline vs Go.CD

Overview

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

AWS CodePipeline

Stacks551

Followers933

Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodePipeline and Go.CD are both continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools that help developers automate the software release process. While they share the common goal of improving development efficiency and software delivery, there are several key differences between the two.

Scalability and Cloud-native Approach: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which means it can easily scale based on demand and offers extensive integration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Go.CD is an open-source tool that can be hosted on-premises or on cloud platforms, providing more flexibility but requiring additional effort for scalability and maintenance.
Ecosystem and Integration: AWS CodePipeline has deep integrations with various AWS services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy, making it seamless for developers who are already using AWS services. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, has a more extensive ecosystem that allows integration with a wide range of tools and plugins, providing developers with more customization options.
Pipeline Configuration and Flexibility: AWS CodePipeline offers a visual interface where developers can easily define and configure pipelines using a simple drag-and-drop mechanism, making it beginner-friendly and quick to set up. Go.CD, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration file called "pipelines as code," allowing developers to define complex pipelines with more flexibility and version control.
Deployment Strategies: AWS CodePipeline provides various deployment strategies such as rolling updates, blue/green deployments, and canary deployments, which allow developers to choose the most suitable strategy for their application updates. Go.CD also supports a flexible deployment strategy, but it requires more manual configuration and customization.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where developers are billed based on the number of active pipelines and monthly active users. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, is free to use and does not have any additional costs associated with it. However, hosting Go.CD on cloud platforms or acquiring enterprise support may have associated costs.
Community and Support: AWS CodePipeline benefits from the extensive support and resources provided by AWS, including documentation, tutorials, and customer support. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, also has a dedicated community that provides support and contributes to its development, but the level of support may vary based on community activity and involvement.

In summary, AWS CodePipeline offers a scalable and cloud-native approach with deep integrations to other AWS services, while Go.CD provides greater flexibility in terms of hosting options and integrations with a wider range of tools. The choice between the two will depend on specific requirements, expertise, and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GoCD, AWS CodePipeline

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GoCD	AWS CodePipeline
GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.	CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.	Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 980	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 205	Stacks 551
Followers 325	Followers 933
Votes 207	Votes 30
Pros & Cons
Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support	Pros 13 Simple to set up 8 Managed service 4 GitHub integration 3 Parallel Execution 2 Automatic deployment Cons 2 No project boards 1 No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
Docker Kubernetes Slack	Runscope Amazon S3 GitHub Jenkins CloudBees BlazeMeter Ghost Inspector AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to GoCD, AWS CodePipeline?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Scalability and Cloud-native Approach: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which means it can easily scale based on demand and offers extensive integration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Go.CD is an open-source tool that can be hosted on-premises or on cloud platforms, providing more flexibility but requiring additional effort for scalability and maintenance.
Ecosystem and Integration: AWS CodePipeline has deep integrations with various AWS services, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy, making it seamless for developers who are already using AWS services. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, has a more extensive ecosystem that allows integration with a wide range of tools and plugins, providing developers with more customization options.
Pipeline Configuration and Flexibility: AWS CodePipeline offers a visual interface where developers can easily define and configure pipelines using a simple drag-and-drop mechanism, making it beginner-friendly and quick to set up. Go.CD, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration file called "pipelines as code," allowing developers to define complex pipelines with more flexibility and version control.
Deployment Strategies: AWS CodePipeline provides various deployment strategies such as rolling updates, blue/green deployments, and canary deployments, which allow developers to choose the most suitable strategy for their application updates. Go.CD also supports a flexible deployment strategy, but it requires more manual configuration and customization.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where developers are billed based on the number of active pipelines and monthly active users. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, is free to use and does not have any additional costs associated with it. However, hosting Go.CD on cloud platforms or acquiring enterprise support may have associated costs.
Community and Support: AWS CodePipeline benefits from the extensive support and resources provided by AWS, including documentation, tutorials, and customer support. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, also has a dedicated community that provides support and contributes to its development, but the level of support may vary based on community activity and involvement.

AWS CodePipeline vs Go.CD

Overview